Originally Posted by
Dry1313
It really isn't though.
As someone who went and sat in the upper deck at the old place and someone who's sat there at the new, I'll tell you right now, it's pretty damned close. The trajectories are different though. What's missed upon everyone is that the guys going yard are more often then not power guys. What's also missed is that nearly every pitch hit out is a terrible pitch that is going to be hit out. Burnett, Joba, Hughes, and Wang have made significant mistakes in leaving balls up, and you can't do that at a small park.
Yankee Stadium was always like this though...the wind blows out a little bit more but you're going to see the homers die down in the humid months coming up.
So is Petco Park "sad" the other way? Are Coors Field and Minute Maid park also travesties? I don't buy it at all...parks are parks, players hit homeruns.
How's CitiField and it's new dimensions working, by the way? I haven't seen any numbers on it, and I'm interested to see the discrepancies, with CitiField being bigger and an NL Park...
(Mets have hit 14 HRs, 13 3Bs, and 28 2B for 55 XBH; Opponents have hit 17 HRs, 3 3B, and 32 2B for 52 XBH. This is all in 20 games. So 107 XBH in 20 games is about 5.3 XBH/G)
(Yankees have hit 39 HR, 2 3B and 38 2B for 79 XBH; Opponents have hit 36 HR, 2 3B and 33 2B for 71 XBH. So 150 XBH in 20 games is about 7.5 XBH per game.)
Factor in the fact that there's a DH in the AL and that the Yankees are a high-powered offense and there's our discrepancy. Yankees have played 4 vs. CLE, 2 vs. OAK, 3 vs. LAA, 2 vs. BOS, 2 vs. TB, 4 vs. MIN, 3 vs. BAL and 1 vs. PHI.
Let's see...LAA, BOS, TB, MIN and PHI all have legitimate lineups. That leave OAK, CLE and BAL. With the way the Yankees have been pitching, are you THAT surprised? I'm not.
See, it's one thing to say something, but the stats and schedule really show that ultimately it comes down to the team playing there, not the park itself.