Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

  1. #1
    Let's Roll CrazyEights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    6,314
    MLB ERA
    3.70

    Trade Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    BOS (ML) Trades:

    LF Frankie Pepper 3.0 stars 4 mil
    CF Matt Christopher 5.0 spec 300k
    3B Fernando Sucre 5.0 spec MLC
    SP Bud Weiser 5.0 spec MLC
    SP Harry Brizzolara 4.0 spec MLC

    Money Balance Players
    RF Scott Hairston 2.5 stars 2.15 mil
    MR Nathan Bumstead 2.5 stars 1.6 mil
    MR Brett Myers 2.5 stars 1.55 mil

    Total 9.6 mil


    CHI Trades
    CL Paul Kamp 4.0 stars 300k
    CF Grady Sizemore 3.5 stars 20 mil
    SP Justin McKnight 5.0 spec 300k
    2012 1st round pick (#23 overall)

    Total 20.6 mil
    Cash: 5.0 mil
    Net Total: 15.6 mil

    Note:

    We know this is over 10 players and cash however there is no fair way to seperate it for the TC to view it so execute as 2 seperate trades but evaluate as 1.

  2. #2
    14,558 Unread Posts browntown653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,666
    MLB ERA
    2.44

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Is this allowed?

    Either way, I don't want to pass it.
    I did a lot of good things as a sim league GM.

    Ah, give me something clever to say here.

  3. #3
    Let's Roll CrazyEights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    6,314
    MLB ERA
    3.70

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    I'll allow it, if it passes

  4. #4
    Broadcaster DMBZeppelin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Griffith, IN
    Posts
    1,582
    AAA ERA
    5.04

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Fail.

    Boston gives up too much. Even if I don't consider money balancing players. Chicago also dumps a lot of cash.

    Bottom line.

    Pepper, Christopher, Sucre, Weiser >>> Sizemore, McKnight, 1st round draft pick.

    I mean considering Christopher is pretty much a much younger sizemore, and McKnight and Weiser and pretty similar. I'm not understanding why Boston is giving up so much more.
    Former GM of...
    S3SL Padres 2017-2030
    SBSL Isotopes 2007-2009
    TSSL Cubs 2006-2018
    TPSL Cubs 2007-2018

  5. #5
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Has Weiser progressed any? If I remember him correctly, he hadn't and he only has 2 pitches. He didn't strike me as a very good player down the road if he even developes. I do not have the site up for reference though, I'll have to vote later.
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  6. #6
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    I'll pass. For me the add ins amount to nothing for me so I'm not looking at them much. I'm not crazy about Peppers despite the highly unrealistic start. Sizemore is pretty good. For me, I'd much rather have the upper echelon or potentially upper echelon pitching and McKnight is 10's across and Kamp's a strong reliever/closer. And they make a combined 600k right now. In this overly stacked league, I'd much rather have a 10 10 10 ace starting pitcher and a closer with a sub 1 era.

    Chicago still gets a nice haul since Christopher could be really good. I'm not sold on Weiser but he still has a lot of potential.
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  7. #7
    Destined to mediocrity
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Near Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    6,644
    MLB ERA
    6.44

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    I'll pass it as well. I think Boston gets the better end of it over the next 3 years and Chicago reaps it's dividends three to ten years down the road... although McKnight and Christopher have immediate impact potential although both have underperformed stat wise...

    Close enough.

  8. #8

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Pretty ridiculous, but if the player limit isn't an issue I'll pass.

    LeagueTeam NameDIVWCWSSince
    TBSLCINCINNATI REDS0002010
    SBSLKANSAS CITY MONARCHS2102008
    TPSLLOS ANGELES ANGELS3012007
    S3SLSEATTLE MARINERS1002026
    GET NOTICED.

  9. #9
    Let's Roll CrazyEights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    6,314
    MLB ERA
    3.70

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Quote Originally Posted by DMBZeppelin View Post
    Fail.

    Boston gives up too much. Even if I don't consider money balancing players. Chicago also dumps a lot of cash.

    Bottom line.

    Pepper, Christopher, Sucre, Weiser >>> Sizemore, McKnight, 1st round draft pick.

    I mean considering Christopher is pretty much a much younger sizemore, and McKnight and Weiser and pretty similar. I'm not understanding why Boston is giving up so much more.
    I agree and disagree with this. I don't think that Boston is giving up more than Chicago. Sizemore is a great player, and isn't ancient, he is still under 30. McKnight is young and already fully developed, unlike Weiser who still has a long way to go. The draft pick could be a very player. I think this trade is very lopsided towards Boston. The part that I agree with is the fail, I'm sorry, but I just can't pass. Without the draft pick, I would pass.

  10. #10
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Trade - BOS (ML) - CHI

    Ok, well, I'm going to pass this. Because I feel like, in the end, Boston gets the better end of the bargain, but the thing DMB forgot to mention in his is Kamp. Who, yes, I know he's a reliever and they often get the short end of value. But his popularity I feel is very underrated, and that is some money right there. Also, he's 24. He's the X factor in this deal for me.

    Plus, McKnight is just irreplacable. Now I know that Weiser is 10-9-10 and decently filled out. But you cant duplicate him. He has everything.

    To me, this is decently even, enough to PASS
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •