Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 75 of 75

Thread: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

  1. #61
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Ideas / rumors / trades

    Wow doesn't change the fact you didn't say it yesterday nor print this anywhere i could see. He hasn't proven anything at the ML level so Fuson can think what he wants. It doesn't change the fact that they would be trading Bay for less than what he's worth. You were wrong!!!

    LEEEEEEEEEOOOOO!!

  2. #62
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    you both know they're coming here, why do you keep giving me more work by responding in the other thread?

    For the record, I'm not making this move because of the silly argument going on, I'm doing so because it's clearly become its own discussion and I'm using the other thread as a general offseason news type thread for a sticky.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  3. #63
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    I agree Leo but also agree it needs to come to a stop if we go by your guidelines. No one is talking about Bay anymore.

  4. #64
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Eh, it's still treading the edge of baseball talk, as it's centering around the validity of a rumor.

    If I can ask you both to just accept that it's a rumor (don't take that as a shot, just either accept it or continue to accept it, whichever is the case) and move on with the discussion.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  5. #65
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    It hasn't been about the validity for a couple of days now at least on my part. I have said it was a rumor from the start. Now they are fighting about stuff I have no idea about but somehow should since they just brought it up today. It's weird. You still have some work to do.

  6. #66
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Thanks for moving it though. It's nice to have a civil discussion on the other thread.

  7. #67
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    You're right it wasn't yesterday it was the day before yesterday, which is even worse..........lmfao

    Re: 2008 Ideas / rumors / trades - 10-02-2007, 04:47 PM - Keep It For Later

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The rumor wasn't started in San Diego.......
    Pitt is shopping him this offseason.....
    Bay already had knee surgery......might have another
    Grady Fusion disagrees with a stoner then......
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  8. #68
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Disagrees with what? You were talking about the article since you went

    Grady Fusion disagrees with a stoner then......

    Boom! you posted an article. It had nothing to do with Headley! I thought you were talking about Bay being available since you put in bold the Padres when he was talking about possible teams to go to. It was too vague to know what you really maent which wasn't Headley or else you would have posted something on Headley. Not once did you say he was ML ready, NOT ONCE!!

  9. #69
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Once again.......for those that are very slow and pretty stupid

    Reefer's post on 10/2/07
    Chase Headley who is not Major League ready
    followed by PFF's post on 10/2/07
    Grady Fusion disagrees with a stoner then......
    Headley isn't ML ready..........Grady Fuson disagrees...........meaning a team expert says he is ready........is this clear for you ? We were discussing Headley in this specific part of the conversation.......Are you keeping up ?
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  10. #70
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Is it HEAD-ly or HEED-ly.

    In terms of pronunciation.

  11. #71
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    I've heard it only pronounced Head-lee
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  12. #72
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    It shows a lot about you since I posts my ideas in every single forum and you are the only one who cries about it. Everyone else can carry on a discussion like Frm and I are right now without crying like a baby and arguing the dumbest shit. Why is it always you that has to cry and keep it uncivilized? No one else has a problem with me giving my opinions and thoughts but you. There was a recent thread that asked if I was a troll and everyone voted no!! No one else cries like you do and my only question is why? Why can't you just stick to baseball???????

  13. #73
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Fine, thread closed
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  14. #74
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Quote Originally Posted by padrefanforever View Post

    Headley isn't ML ready..........Grady Fuson disagrees...........meaning a team expert says he is ready........is this clear for you ? We were discussing Headley in this specific part of the conversation.......Are you keeping up ?
    LOLOL Sorry but no. No sir, not ever. You leave a vague ass message like that after talking about Bay, who we were talking about, and then post an article about Bay but somehow I am supposed to know that you are talking about Headley? Sorry Crybaby, not a mind reader.

  15. #75
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Jason Bay available in 2008 according to 1090

    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo View Post
    Fine, thread closed
    ...
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •