Pittsburgh trades:
SP Oliver Perez, 4.0 stars ($5,000,000)
Salary total: $ 5,000,000
Colorado trades:
2B Charles Fabela, 3.5 prospect stars MLC
SP Chin-Hui Tsao, 3.0 stars ($6,000,000)
Salary total: $ 6,000,000
Pittsburgh trades:
SP Oliver Perez, 4.0 stars ($5,000,000)
Salary total: $ 5,000,000
Colorado trades:
2B Charles Fabela, 3.5 prospect stars MLC
SP Chin-Hui Tsao, 3.0 stars ($6,000,000)
Salary total: $ 6,000,000
.: My Last.fm
Finally... Perez is out of the Central!
Yeah, it mus tbe nice to have that 4.55 career ERA out of the NL Central. It was terrorizing you.
Wait... what? I didn't offer anything better than that? I coulda swore I offered a better pitcher and a better 2nd baseman... how did that work out? Once again I show... I am truly the Mets of this league. I just out and out suck at life.
Liriano hasn't exactly produced much in his short career.
Saber.......one day we will meet in the WS...............one day
Yeah, but one less stud pitcher for you means a lot to the rest of the NL Central teams.Originally Posted by McKain
That's the beauty.
Tsao is even better than Oliver; he's been doing what Oliver has for his entire career, while pitching in Coors.
Originally Posted by albbla2000mu
They have sims in Hell? Oh shit.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
But the difference between Liriano and Tsao (4.70 even... damn he blew up in September... to 4.10 ERA last season... plus more potential talent, and 2 1/2 extra years... but for the sake of argument, we'll assume that the statistical numbers are all that matter here)... is worth the potential of Fabela, in comparison to Felts?Originally Posted by McKain
This is not meant to be antagonistic right now... I'm still learning the game here, so perhaps you can enlighten me as to what I'm missing.
Edit: Forget about it, I think I see the problem. Felts plays no defense, and has no eye... so the subtraction in contact... plus the addition in age, which I overlooked initially... is what the thing is. Alright, you probably did get a better deal than I initially assumed.