Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

  1. #16
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    Somebody is jumping the gun for being in 3rd place and having the 29th best bullpen (The Natinals save you from being last)

    I'd be surprised without a overhaul of the bullpen for the Yankees to make the playoffs.
    When your starters can go 7 innings and let up 1 run, it isn't as bad as you'd think.

    We've won 8 straight, we're sweeping the O's tomorrow, taking 2/3 from Philly, taking 2/3 at Texas, and then taking 3/4 if not sweeping Cleveland.

    We're 2.5 games out of first. If you think that you can 7 out of your next ten, then more power to you. We'll be in first within 15 games.

  2. #17
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    When your starters can go 7 innings and let up 1 run, it isn't as bad as you'd think.

    We've won 8 straight, we're sweeping the O's tomorrow, taking 2/3 from Philly, taking 2/3 at Texas, and then taking 3/4 if not sweeping Cleveland.

    We're 2.5 games out of first. If you think that you can 7 out of your next ten, then more power to you. We'll be in first within 15 games.
    0-5 vs the Red Sox

    Starters ERA:

    Joba: 3.76 ERA
    Burnett: 5.02 ERA
    Pettite: 4.18 ERA
    Hughes: 7.06 ERA
    CC (He's good): 3.43 ERA

    Not likely they will continue to only let up 1 run (Yes u are hot but it won't last forever)

    AverageIP/ Start
    Joba: 5.74 IP/Start
    Burnett: 6.5 IP/Start
    Pettite: 6.4 IP/Start
    Hughes: 4.24 IP/Start
    CC: 7 IP/Start

    When you only have 1 starter averaging 7 IP it means that you need to get 6 outs before you get to Mariano.

    When things are going well you think your fine, but you still have a problem, your bullpen is pathetic, even today Coke did everything he could to choke it away.

    If you don't fix the problem with a major overhaul, you are more likely to finish 4th than in 1st.

    Don't be a homer, the Red Sox are better in every facet of the game than you.
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  3. #18
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    0-5 vs the Red Sox
    Have you ever heard of streaks? They're a big thing in baseball...

    We might be 0-5 vs BOS, but we're 8-0 in our last 8.

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    Starters ERA:

    Joba: 3.76 ERA
    Burnett: 5.02 ERA
    Pettite: 4.18 ERA
    Hughes: 7.06 ERA
    CC (He's good): 3.43 ERA

    Not likely they will continue to only let up 1 run (Yes u are hot but it won't last forever)
    This is stupid as hell. These ERAs prove MY point.

    Burnett is a 3.75 ERA guy...so for his ERA to fall toward his average he will pitch better.

    Pettite is where he should be, so is Joba, CC is going to drop to sub 3.

    As far as Hughes, he K'd 9 tonight and I like him out of our pen.

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    AverageIP/ Start
    Joba: 5.74 IP/Start
    Burnett: 6.5 IP/Start
    Pettite: 6.4 IP/Start
    Hughes: 4.24 IP/Start
    CC: 7 IP/Start
    The only bad one here is Hughes, and Wang is back to form.

    I don't even care about this, find me a team with starters averaging so much better than the Yankees 1-4

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    When you only have 1 starter averaging 7 IP it means that you need to get 6 outs before you get to Mariano.
    Don't act like you know what you're talking about here:
    A: We have an inconsistent pen, but not a bad one. Veras is dirty when he throws strikes, and Coke is unhittable when he gets ahead.

    With Chicken Alfredo Aceves, Phil Hughes, and Brian Bruney leading the setup corps we'll be into October, easily.

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    When things are going well you think your fine, but you still have a problem, your bullpen is pathetic, even today Coke did everything he could to choke it away.
    Coke sucks right now...but we're still winning.

    If you're all about averages, Yankee pitching has to improve. If you're not, then look at our recent success.

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    If you don't fix the problem with a major overhaul, you are more likely to finish 4th than in 1st.

    Don't be a homer, the Red Sox are better in every facet of the game than you.


    David Ortiz hit his first homer of the year...are you serious?

    Check out your SOS...SEA, CLE, OAK, TB...

    KC and DET for us, and then basically an identical schedule...that's the funny thing.

    Your team has maxed its potential and you aren't exactly setting the league on fire.

    BTW, this was the most hypocritical quote I've ever seen.

  4. #19
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    Have you ever heard of streaks? They're a big thing in baseball...

    We might be 0-5 vs BOS, but we're 8-0 in our last 8.
    Congrats you can beat the Orioles, Minnesota and Toronto (who is not that good as we are showing now) whose combined record is 2 games under 500... real good competition


    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    This is stupid as hell. These ERAs prove MY point.

    Burnett is a 3.75 ERA guy...so for his ERA to fall toward his average he will pitch better.

    Pettite is where he should be, so is Joba, CC is going to drop to sub 3.

    As far as Hughes, he K'd 9 tonight and I like him out of our pen.
    Burnett will be lucky if he sniffs 4... he'll be closer to 4.5 where he belongs in a real division.

    Idk if CC will get to sub 3, but I am not arguing him... he is good. Even still Joba and Pettite aren't getting to the 7th inning, requires more bullpen work

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    The only bad one here is Hughes, and Wang is back to form.

    I don't even care about this, find me a team with starters averaging so much better than the Yankees 1-4
    Are you kidding me about Wang, he has a sinker that didn't sink in the rehab start, until that problem gets fixed he's terrible and will be terrible, he's not your savior. I said preseason he sucked, and he still does.

    The Yankees are averaging 20th in the MLB according to Baseball Prospectus in IP/GS

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    Don't act like you know what you're talking about here:
    A: We have an inconsistent pen, but not a bad one. Veras is dirty when he throws strikes, and Coke is unhittable when he gets ahead.

    With Chicken Alfredo Aceves, Phil Hughes, and Brian Bruney leading the setup corps we'll be into October, easily.


    Coke sucks right now...but we're still winning.

    If you're all about averages, Yankee pitching has to improve. If you're not, then look at our recent success.
    Even with your amazing hot streak, you are still 25th in bullpen era at 5.37... I define that as terrible... as opposed to Boston which is at 3.00.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post

    David Ortiz hit his first homer of the year...are you serious?

    Check out your SOS...SEA, CLE, OAK, TB...

    KC and DET for us, and then basically an identical schedule...that's the funny thing.

    Your team has maxed its potential and you aren't exactly setting the league on fire.

    BTW, this was the most hypocritical quote I've ever seen.
    Yep, we are 24-16, losing the #3 man in MVP voting last year and batting over .400 in Youk to the DL, our #2 starter since April 14th, not to mention we are on our 3rd string SS and with Ortiz sucking.

    We also have made our 2 west coast trips, we are done for the YEAR, so enjoy all that flying too, and the SOS doesn't mean anything in early May. Toronto looks good but they've played no one.

    When you rank 25th in bullpen era and 22nd in starters ERA, thats not a good sign at all. Our rotation isn't performing up to snuff but we have the 3rd best bullpen ERA to make up for it.

    You have to solve the pitching before u can consider yourself AL East contenders
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  5. #20
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    Burnett will be lucky if he sniffs 4... he'll be closer to 4.5 where he belongs in a real division.
    You know.....that's funny......because I recall him having a 4.07, 3.75, and 3.98 ERA..............IN THE SAME DIVISION HE'S IN NOW. And he was on one of the shitty teams, so that means he played all the good ones.
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  6. #21
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    You know.....that's funny......because I recall him having a 4.07, 3.75, and 3.98 ERA..............IN THE SAME DIVISION HE'S IN NOW. And he was on one of the shitty teams, so that means he played all the good ones.
    That doesn't include the New York Factor which affects every first year player... He'll be right about 4.5
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  7. #22
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    That doesn't include the New York Factor which affects every first year player... He'll be right about 4.5

    Right.....his New York Factor. Forgot about that stat, thank you Mr. Sabermetrician for that one.

    That's the worst ****ing argument for a player to have a worse year I have ever heard. That New York Factor is really affecting Mark Teixeira, man...

    And that New York Factor......it's really getting to AJ. You know, with him having given up 3 ER or less in 5 of his 8 starts.....

    My god.........."The New York Factor"...........honestly.......I really don't know what to say. Coming from an educated baseball person, I expect a lot better from you
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  8. #23
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Stats Yr Before Yankees/1st Year with Yankees

    Alex Rodriguez

    Year Before: .298 BA, .396 OBP .600 SLG 47 HR's 118 RBI's 124 Runs
    1st Year: .286 BA, .375 OBP, .512 SLG 36 HR's 106 RBI's 112 Runs

    Kyle Farnsworth

    Year Before: 70 IP 2.19 ERA 16 SV's 19 HLD's
    1st Year: 66 IP 4.36 ERA 6 SV's 19 HLD's

    Johnny Damon

    Year Before .316 BA 94.7 SB % 197 Hits Fielding Range: 2.93
    1st Year .285 BA 71.4% 169 hits Fielding Range 2.56

    Roger Clemens

    Year Before 20-6 2.65 ERA 234.2 IP 271 K's 5 CG's 3 SHO
    1st Year 14-10 4.60 ERA 197 IP 163 K's 1 CG 1 SHO

    (Note: Great evidence for why AJ will be around 4.5 as well)

    Other Names to cruel to post the stats: Pavan and LaTroy Hawkins


    I could keep going but I think this proves my case.
    Last edited by cjkalt; 05-21-2009 at 01:01 AM.
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  9. #24
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    Right.....his New York Factor. Forgot about that stat, thank you Mr. Sabermetrician for that one.

    That's the worst ****ing argument for a player to have a worse year I have ever heard. That New York Factor is really affecting Mark Teixeira, man...

    And that New York Factor......it's really getting to AJ. You know, with him having given up 3 ER or less in 5 of his 8 starts.....

    My god.........."The New York Factor"...........honestly.......I really don't know what to say. Coming from an educated baseball person, I expect a lot better from you
    Amazing

    and for the record historical precedent means that you think it's a consensus. It isn't. Case by case basis. Want me to dig up Scott Brosius, or David Cone, or David Wells even? Maybe Mike Mussina?

    There are arguments both ways for this

  10. #25
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry1313 View Post
    Amazing

    and for the record historical precedent means that you think it's a consensus. It isn't. Case by case basis. Want me to dig up Scott Brosius, or David Cone, or David Wells even? Maybe Mike Mussina?

    There are arguments both ways for this
    You got any role guys like a Brosius, Cone, Wells, or even a Moose that you get in FA anymore, I was comparing superstars to superstars.

    I agree those role guys probably did better cause they didn't have the expectations. These superstar guys do have those expectations so i was comparing them as such.
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  11. #26
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Role guys? How were Moose, Wells, Cone, and Brosius ROLE guys? They were all superstars when they were signed by NY
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  12. #27
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    Role guys? How were Moose, Wells, Cone, and Brosius ROLE guys? They were all superstars when they were signed by NY
    Moose I'll give you

    Brosius? come on he batted .203 the year before he came to NY

    Wells? 5.14 era... thats no burnett ERA

    Cone prolly had some too, but was he a superstar? Debatable...

    The guys i listed were surefire high expectation superstars like CC, Tex, Burnett

    Now I'll agree CC is prolly more like Moose than the other guys

    but for Tex and Burnett I think the comparisions hold
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  13. #28
    14,558 Unread Posts browntown653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,666
    MLB ERA
    2.44

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Good thing Damaso Marte didn't get hit by the New York factor.

    Also, Scott Brosius was never a superstar, or close to one.
    I did a lot of good things as a sim league GM.

    Ah, give me something clever to say here.

  14. #29
    Hall of Famer nyjunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,522
    AAA ERA
    6.09

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    I think that is very overrated, where they having fun a few weeks ago when they were struggling? You win you have fun and they are playin ggood baseball now.

  15. #30
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30

    Re: Got Chemistry? The Yankees do

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    Moose I'll give you

    Brosius? come on he batted .203 the year before he came to NY

    Wells? 5.14 era... thats no burnett ERA

    Cone prolly had some too, but was he a superstar? Debatable...

    The guys i listed were surefire high expectation superstars like CC, Tex, Burnett

    Now I'll agree CC is prolly more like Moose than the other guys

    but for Tex and Burnett I think the comparisions hold
    Teixeira is a notorious slow starter.

    Look at his career splits.

    .249/.349/.433 in March/April with only 22 dingers and 74 RBI in 566 AB (those aren't his career averages...?)
    Check out August:
    .314/.398/.522 with 43 HRs and 136 RBI in 647 AB

    SLOW STARTER. Next.

    GF already debunked your shit on Burnett, and CC is legit.

    Where's your damned New York Factor now?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •