Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 82

Thread: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

  1. #16
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    I feel like Jon Garland is being overlooked by a lot of teams. He would be a great #4 starter for the Mets
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  2. #17
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    I have been talking about Garland for weeks now. I think he's a PERFECT fit. He gives you 200 innings every year, a decent ERA, and with this offense behind him he would easily win 12-15 games. I think he's a perfect fit for what we need, especially being the youngest remaining quality starter....the question is if we can get him.

  3. #18
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Exactly what I'm thinking. Honestly, I really think the Yanks could use him as well, and are overlooking him.

    The Mets absolutely could get Garland if you make a hard enough push. He shouldn't be that expensive, especially since he hasn't gotten much interest
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  4. #19
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    I'd give him 3 or 4 years, 10-12 million per. I hope Omar Minaya is calling his agent right now.

  5. #20
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Free Agency Watch: Kawakami, Takahashi, Saito » NPB Tracker

    The Mets are being called the frontrunners to sign Japanese reliever Ken Takashi. His stats in Japan are decent at best...no word yet on a true scouting report.

  6. #21
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    USATODAY.com


    According to USA Today, the Mets non-tendered Argenis Reyes and Ambiorix Burgos last week. I won't miss Burgos at all, and that was a terrible deal where we gave up Bannister for him. I liked Reyes however, and hopefully they can come up with a deal to bring him back, because Castillo will certainly not be healthy all season.

  7. #22
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Of course you won't miss Burgos!! He'll be in ****ing prison!!!

  8. #23
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Haha, he sucked when he was healthy, he missed a year and a half with tommy john surgery, and he's a crazy asshole who deserves to spend life in jail. Burgos should just disappear, which he may after this arrest and imprisonment.

  9. #24
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    According to multiple sources, the Mets are quiety shopping Luis Castillo, willing to deal for just about anything where the other team would take responsibility for at least part of his salary, obviously, with the intention of then signing Orlando Hudson who has said he wants to be a Mets.

    I was thinking, we need to get rid of Hudson. The Cubs wanted to get rid of Marquis, because they thought it would help them get Peavy. We could use a back end of the rotation starting pitcher. Marquis makes 10 million this year, Castillo makes 18 million over 3 more years. A swap of those two contracts would be fair...they'd cut payroll, we'd have a shorter term deal, and an opening for Hudson. Any thoughts?

  10. #25
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Cubs don't need Castillo at all. It would be a waste.

  11. #26
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    They would cut costs on a per year basis, and would then have the money to possibly re-inquire on Peavy. I know Castillo's not a spectacular player anymore(understatement), but he can't split time with DeRosa or Fontenot?

  12. #27
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by ljshorty89 View Post
    They would cut costs on a per year basis, and would then have the money to possibly re-inquire on Peavy. I know Castillo's not a spectacular player anymore(understatement), but he can't split time with DeRosa or Fontenot?
    Why would the Cubs pay that kind of money for a third string second baseman? Cubs do not need Luis Castillo is my point. Why take on money for a guy you don't need or even want?

  13. #28
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Because taking on that amount of money clears space in the short term for Jake Peavy, a guy who would be such a drastic improvement over Marquis, that one could consider taking on some extra money.

  14. #29
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    Clearing only $3 million for this year while paying $12 million over the next two is not exactly doing the Cubs any favors. That is not going to get them Jake Peavy. Remember, they are looking for a RFer too. Castillo has no place on the Cubs.

  15. #30
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2008-2009 Offseason Thread

    They'd clear 4 million this year, and while they would take on 12 million, they have made it clear that they want to move Marquis, no one else has shown any interest in him. Maybe you're right and it doesn't help them, but neither does holding on to a mediocre overpaid unwanted pitcher.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •