Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 62

Thread: Should MLB move some teams?

  1. #31
    Just a Gigolo DiamondDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Posts
    5,001
    MLB ERA
    4.92
    I don't disagree with the baseball wildcard as it stands... I do; however, disagree that we need MORE wildcards

  2. #32
    GFX guru is back. Element's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    1,603
    MLB ERA
    1.05
    8 teams is better then 4, but we need to stop there. The playoffs are perfect like they are IMO.
    http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/3...irosig6vx8.jpg
    http://strike3forums.com/images/Mari...riners-sig.jpg
    Mariners Artwork | Request a Sig
    Circular logic aside, Mr Mims, you have yet to provide a single credible reason why you are, in fact, hot.

  3. #33
    Just a Gigolo DiamondDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Posts
    5,001
    MLB ERA
    4.92
    Why though??

    The wildcard was simply added so that no matter what the division outcome, the 2nd best team in a given league would then always be included in the playoffs..

    Is there a need for the 8th best team to be in the playoffs when you play a 162 game schedule? IMHO, no... The regular season is what separates the wheat from the chaff.... unlike the NFL where 16 games does not necessarily do all the needed separation

  4. #34
    Future PGA Tour Golfer DirtyKash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    13,057
    MLB ERA
    1.63
    Blog Entries
    14
    Forget about moving teams. Baseball should straight up get rid of: Tampa Bay, Kansas City, Oakland, Minnesota, Florida, Washington, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, Arizona, and Colorado, thus leaving 20 teams. Go back to two divisions per league, five teams per division, shorten the season to somewhere between 140 to 144 games, both division winners make it to the LCS and the winners face off in the World Series. The season is over with in 6 months (playoffs included), meaning longer off-season, more time to recuperate and hence fewer injuries. Not like it's ever going to happen though...

  5. #35
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08
    good luck getting rid of Oakland, one of the original franchises...from Philly to KC to Oakland...

  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by DiamondDave
    And imp.. "please" indeed.. try going back over the history of attendance since the strike or since the inception of all the current teams....

    Consistently, the Rays and the Jays are amung the absolute worst in total attendance and % of seats filled.... and as stated (even by you), Toronto does not have the argument of "small market", that some other teams can have
    Recent history has shown that Toronto can more than support a MLB team, if the team is run properly. The strike combined with some bad seasons immediately after made a lot of hardcore fans lose interest in the game, and Toronto basically had to start from scratch on building a fan base.

    In 2003, Toronto was about the 10th lowest team in total attendance, and I'm sure that improved last year, and I guarantee it will improve again this year. Your argument is completely assinine.

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyKash
    Forget about moving teams. Baseball should straight up get rid of: Tampa Bay, Kansas City, Oakland, Minnesota, Florida, Washington, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, Arizona, and Colorado, thus leaving 20 teams. Go back to two divisions per league, five teams per division, shorten the season to somewhere between 140 to 144 games, both division winners make it to the LCS and the winners face off in the World Series. The season is over with in 6 months (playoffs included), meaning longer off-season, more time to recuperate and hence fewer injuries. Not like it's ever going to happen though...
    I'm all for a shorter season. 162 games is a ridiculous number.

  8. #38
    Who knew we could win? Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's
    Posts
    18,178
    MLB ERA
    4.59
    Blog Entries
    8
    they will NEVER get rid of 10 teams. Baseball should have a 6 team playoff per league not 8 though. How you might ask?

    3 divison champs, 3 best people after that.

    Best TWO divison winners get bye
    3rd Best Divison Winners vs 6th best team (best of 3 or 5)
    4th best team vs 5th best team (same as above)

    #1 Seed faces highest winning seed (best of 7)
    #2 Seed faces lower seeded team (best of 7)

    LCS- 7 games
    WS- 7 games

    Reduce the season from 162 to 154 games or even 150 games. to give a bigger timeframe for the expanded playoffs. I think this would bring more excitement to game than it is. I also understand the purists who would be absolutely against this too.
    2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)

    TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
    MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
    TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)

  9. #39
    Just a Gigolo DiamondDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Posts
    5,001
    MLB ERA
    4.92
    Quote Originally Posted by Impossibles
    Recent history has shown that Toronto can more than support a MLB team, if the team is run properly. The strike combined with some bad seasons immediately after made a lot of hardcore fans lose interest in the game, and Toronto basically had to start from scratch on building a fan base.

    In 2003, Toronto was about the 10th lowest team in total attendance, and I'm sure that improved last year, and I guarantee it will improve again this year. Your argument is completely assinine.
    Please... assinine indeed when you cannot even get your figures straight

    2003 - 23rd in attendance - 3rd worst in home % of attendance to capacity

    and that is their 2nd best in recent history to 2001, where they were still 23rd, but 5th worst in % attendance

    But they are one of the very few teams that is continually at the bottom, and on average one of the 4 worst... and as stated by you, they are not 'small market'

  10. #40
    Just a Gigolo DiamondDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Posts
    5,001
    MLB ERA
    4.92
    Recent population statistics of the areas where the continual worst attendance is with MLB (not including Montreal)

    Toronto - 4,682,897
    Tampa - 2,531,908
    Kansas City - 1,904,908
    Milwaukee - 1,514,313
    Pittsburgh - 2,410,330
    Miami - 5,288,796

    Now of these Miami is the tops in population, and amung the lowest in attendance as well.. which would put it in with Tampa and Toronto as the ones really not supporting it's team over a long period of time

  11. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by DiamondDave
    Recent population statistics of the areas where the continual worst attendance is with MLB (not including Montreal)

    Toronto - 4,682,897
    Tampa - 2,531,908
    Kansas City - 1,904,908
    Milwaukee - 1,514,313
    Pittsburgh - 2,410,330
    Miami - 5,288,796

    Now of these Miami is the tops in population, and amung the lowest in attendance as well.. which would put it in with Tampa and Toronto as the ones really not supporting it's team over a long period of time
    I said about 10th, 7th worst is pretty close to about 10th.

    So your argument is to move teams out of certain markets based on fan attendance:area population ratios? I can see you're an astute business man.

  12. #42
    Hall of Famer Steak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Place where you can dump Uranium (NJ)
    Posts
    2,323
    AA ERA
    12.42
    That's a good question. It depends on the situation. DK talks about how the Twins should be contracted. Yes the Twins have problems drawing and shame on the fans for not going to the games at the Dome considering ticket prices at the Dome are so reasonable compare to Fenway and Yankee Stadium, but if they get an outdoor stadium, I think the Twins would draw well. Still no excuse for not drawing. I have a feeling the Twins will move or be contracted by then which would be unfortunate.

    I think Toronto is a good baseball town. They are not drawing because the product stinks and the team is not fun to watch. I think when the Jays start getting better and be a consistent contender for a few years, then fans will start to come. If the Raptors can draw well even when they stink, there is no reason to think the Jays can do the same when they become good.

    The Marlins should go though. Miami is a very lousy sports town. Miami simply do not draw well. The Heat are having a great season, but I see lot of empty seats at American Airlines Arena. The Dolphins playoff games seemed to be black out. Marlins have a quality team and they are a WS contender, but for some darn reason, they can't draw well. There is no excuses for fans not to come out and watch the Marlins. Toronto would die to have a team like that. Marlins has had problems drawing at regular season games and their lack of revenues are why players have left.

    I think Oakland is a good baseball town, but the stadium is way too old and outdated. It's hard for them to get revenue that way. They need a new stadium like the Twins or they will probably be contracted or gone.

    I used to think contraction may be the way to go, but I change my mind. I think any team can be good with smart management no matter what type of revenue or payroll they have to work with.

    Should be there more playoff teams? No. It's fine as it is.

  13. #43
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    Quote Originally Posted by DiamondDave
    Recent population statistics of the areas where the continual worst attendance is with MLB (not including Montreal)

    Toronto - 4,682,897
    Tampa - 2,531,908
    Kansas City - 1,904,908
    Milwaukee - 1,514,313
    Pittsburgh - 2,410,330
    Miami - 5,288,796

    Now of these Miami is the tops in population, and amung the lowest in attendance as well.. which would put it in with Tampa and Toronto as the ones really not supporting it's team over a long period of time
    huh? Tampa should get punished for Miami's lack of support for the Marlins?
    Not that I don't think Tampa should be moved or contracted (if a team is to be moved or contracted, that is) but that's some odd reasoning
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  14. #44
    GFX guru is back. Element's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    1,603
    MLB ERA
    1.05
    He is saying that Miami is in the same pool as Tampa and Toronto.
    http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/3...irosig6vx8.jpg
    http://strike3forums.com/images/Mari...riners-sig.jpg
    Mariners Artwork | Request a Sig
    Circular logic aside, Mr Mims, you have yet to provide a single credible reason why you are, in fact, hot.

  15. #45
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    ah, ok. I misread the remark. Sorry then

    edit: And it's even worse with the Marlins. They won the World Series and still get no support!
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •