Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 87 of 87

Thread: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

  1. #76
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    FLAT reporting that Jamie is still a Jew (well, she is one):
    Frank McCourt says yes to proposed settlement, but Jamie McCourt says no | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times

    "Judge Lichtman has declared the parties to be at impasse. We can only conclude that Jamie rejected Judge Lichtman’s settlement proposal."

    Fine by me. Community property, boyyy.

  2. #77
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    dylanohernandez

    Judge has until Jan. 18 -- not Dec. 28, as originally reported -- to rule in the #McCourt divorce trial: Jamie McCourt rejects divorce settlement proposal - latimes.com

    You have got to be shitting me.

  3. #78
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    Ruling in Dodgers' divorce case expected Tuesday | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times

    But it's looking more and more like the ruling won't mean shit. These two idiots could very well fight until one of them is dead.

  4. #79
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    FWIW, my prediction is the MPA will be tossed out, and so I'll never have to use the words inclusive and exclusive in the same breath ever again.

  5. #80
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    yup

    molly_knight Breaking: Judge in Dodger divorce trial rules for Jamie McCourt, throws out marital property agreement. #dodgers

  6. #81
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  7. #82
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    Not sure which side to stand on. On one hand, no LAD fan in his right mind wants Frank to own the team for a long time. On the other hand, it remains to be seen if the Team Jamie zealots will get the forced sale they're hoping for. I don't believe for a second that she isn't in it just for a massive alimony.

  8. #83
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    (better late than never)

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfan28 View Post
    Frank and Jamie put the luster in clusterf***
    Umm...thanks for this worthless remark.

  9. #84
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Dodgers Fuck you David Boies.

    Link

    Boies says Frank can buy Jamie out with a back-loaded deal, paying some now and a lot later if he realizes a potential windfall.
    Yeah..that would just wrap up all their problems with a neat bow tie on top!

    Oh, but wait..

    "The thing that would be best for Frank and Jamie and their children, in my opinion, isn't necessarily the best for Los Angeles and for the Dodgers," Boies said.
    Seriously, fuck you. Who do you think we are, ****s?
    Last edited by realmofotalk; 02-10-2011 at 03:47 AM.

  10. #85
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    'Frank McCourt owns the Dodgers. Jamie McCourt does not,' says attorney for Frank | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times
    Trope said that in the next trial -- to determine which assets are Frank's, which are Jamie's and which are shared -- Frank would get the Dodgers because they are titled in his name and title trumps community property.

    "We are very, very confident that Jamie would be unable to rebut the presumption of title," Trope said.
    Title trumps community property? Who is he trying to fool, himself?

  11. #86
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    Frank and Jamie McCourt have reached a settlement over the ownership of the Dodgers.
    Frank will pay Jamie $130 million to buy out her shares of the team. He could still be forced to sell if Major League Baseball gets its wish, but at least that process will be a bit simpler now that it's not tied to the McCourts' divorce proceedings. Frank is currently trudging the organization through bankruptcy court.
    At least one step is over with.

  12. #87
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)

    The idea that this bitch can just walk away with $130 million knowing full well she was every bit as responsible as her ex for the bullshit they put the team through pisses me the fuck off.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •