Which 2005 last place team won't finish last in 2006?

**Providence A's** · 04-14-2006 06:26 PM

Which team that finished in last place in their division in 2005 is least likely to finish there in 2006?

**Fishercat** · 04-14-2006 06:30 PM

I chose Washington, only because Florida has so little outside of their two big stars. I think Hanley will cool off, and they will settle into a level of suck. Colorado's a good choice, as is Pittsburgh considering there are 5 other teams in the division

**redsrbetter** · 04-14-2006 06:32 PM

I have to say the Rockies. They are doing a heck of a lot better on the road this year and they have a very young solid team. I think they could even contend for the pennant if they can get some of the younger guys to meet their talent.

**Providence A's** · 04-14-2006 06:34 PM

I was torn between Washington and Seattle...I ended up voting for Seattle because I think Texas will finish last due to their pitching...but I think both will get out of the basement.

**General** · 04-14-2006 06:40 PM

I'm giving it to Washington, but my dumbass voted for Pittsburgh by accident.

**MarinersFan87** · 04-14-2006 06:41 PM

Washington is the safest bet. But I think we'll finish above Texas too, I also don't think that Pittsburgh finishes last.

**Dry1313** · 04-14-2006 06:48 PM

Pittsburgh has great young talent and Cincy has bumbling management so I don't see them in last. Also, I like Tampa's youth so I don't see them in last either. Obviously Washington won't be in last, and I don't know if Seattle will be. But I think it's a safe bet to see Colorado and KC in the cellar once again.

**A'sDiehard** · 04-14-2006 06:49 PM

I'm going with the Rockies; hell, they hit something like six doubles in one game on the road recently. That said I remember them starting out hot last year and their announcers being all excited.