Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Zach Day for Preston Wilson?

  1. #1
    Guess Who's Back missionhockey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    18,014
    MLB ERA
    1.56
    Blog Entries
    8

    Zach Day for Preston Wilson?

    Per Ken Rosenthal:
    The Rockies have agreed to trade outfielder Preston Wilson to the Nationals for righthanded pitcher Zach Day and Class AAA outfielder J.J. Davis, the Sporting News has learned.

    Before the deal can be completed, the two clubs must agree on how much the Nationals will pay on what remains of Wilson's $12.5 million salary. Also, Wilson must OK the deal because the Nationals are one of five teams to which he can reject a trade.
    Article Link

  2. #2
    Guess Who's Back missionhockey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    18,014
    MLB ERA
    1.56
    Blog Entries
    8
    Wilson's contract is terrible and his numbers will likely take a good hit due to the RFK factor. But then again the Nats aren't paying a whole lot in terms of talent for him.

  3. #3
    Day could be good in Coors as a big time groundball pitcher.
    http://strike3forums.com/forums/phot...pelbon2006.jpg


    Then out of fairness to the others you will be Slagathor.

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer awefullspellare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,653
    AA ERA
    12.63
    For some reason I have always been very sad that we are trading Wilson, but his numbers are horrible this year playing in Coors. Maybe it's ok if Day and this Davis kid do good. That said I don't expect anything out of Day, he's a pitcher.
    I aim to try
    "Nothing is what rocks dream of."-Aristotle

  5. #5
    Guess Who's Back missionhockey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    18,014
    MLB ERA
    1.56
    Blog Entries
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Fishercat
    Day could be good in Coors as a big time groundball pitcher.
    The problem with Day is that his ground to fly ratio keeps going down. Not to mention his erratic control, I just can't see this being a good move.

    Code:
    Season IP G/F
    2002 37.1 3.14
    2003 131.1 2.72
    2004 116.2 2.09
    2005 36.0 1.55

  6. #6
    It wasn't a great move, but the Rocks didn't exactly give up Todd Helton for Day. more of a salary dump by the Rockies.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  7. #7
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61
    Seems to be dead according to Buster Olney
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  8. #8
    Well didn't know Wilson could reject the deal, which could be the problem.

    If the deal does get done, it's a salary dump by Rockies and overall a good deal for both sides.

  9. #9
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61
    I don't think it being dead was cause of Wilson's preference of going or not going to D.C. It was issues with the trade itself, the minor leaguers Colorado getting and the money.
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  10. #10
    Minor Leaguer natfan2k5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    davenport iowa
    Posts
    41
    Rookie ERA
    1.14
    i like the trade preston gives us depth at cf just incase brad gets hurt and giving up zach shouldnt hurt since we signed mike stanton

  11. #11
    Who knew we could win? Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's
    Posts
    18,178
    MLB ERA
    4.59
    Blog Entries
    8
    What my issue with this deal is what are they going to do when Ryan Church comes back. Wilson is a FA at the end of the season, doubtful they bring him back. Church has had a solid season for them (hitting over .310) and Wilkerson has been pretty good for them as a leadoff hitter. Jose Guillen is hitting the cover off the ball. Now they have Wilson too?!?!? It would be intresting to see what they do from there.
    2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)

    TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
    MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
    TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)

  12. #12
    Banned BaseballFanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    574
    Rookie ERA
    287.00
    You got Mike Stanton! Hold on I'm not done yet . He's going to wreck the Nationals.

  13. #13
    Dude, the Mets are the ones that signed him AFTER he was done for A LOT of money. You've got NOTHING to laugh at.

    Besides...YOU traded Kazmir.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  14. #14
    Banned BaseballFanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    574
    Rookie ERA
    287.00
    Yea, but last year I laughed, but not a funny laugh. It was more like the "OMFG the Mets are so stupid!" kind of laugh.

  15. #15
    Minor Leaguer natfan2k5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    davenport iowa
    Posts
    41
    Rookie ERA
    1.14
    did u guys see preston hit a homer his first at bat as a nat to bad we lost maybe we got a good deal i think now that ive seen him play

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •