Saber, Moskos only adds up to 48 pts, which is 2 shy for a type-B reliever. If I was going to qualify him as a starter, he would need more innings.
Printable View
Saber, Moskos only adds up to 48 pts, which is 2 shy for a type-B reliever. If I was going to qualify him as a starter, he would need more innings.
Okay, just wondering. I didn't do the math.
Sorry Leo, hold on. I'll post it
============================================
New STATISTICAL Qualifications For Class A & Class B Free Agents
A) Class A hitter compensation will be decided by...
1. A minimum of 500 PLATE APPEARANCES
2. An OPS of .830 or higher
B) class B hitter compensation will be decided by...
1. A minimum of 400 PLATE APPEARANCES
2. An OPS of .750 or higher
C) Class A starter compensation will be decided by...
1. A minimum of 200 IP
2. 25 starts
3. An ERA of 3.70 or lower
D) Class B starter compensation will be decided by...
1. A minimum of 150 innings pitched
2. 18 starts
3. An ERA of 4.25 or lower
E) Class A reliever compensation will be decided by...
1. Either 70 appearances or 70 IP
2. An ERA under 2.80
F) class B reliever compensation will be decided by...
1. either 50 appearances or 50 IP
2. an ERA under 3.25
============================================
New RATINGS Qualifications For Class A & Class B Free Agents
**Hitters must still have 500 PA to be elligible to qualify for Class A, or 400 PA to be elligible to qualify for Class B**
**Relievers must still have 70 appearences or 70 IP to be elligible to qualify for Class A, or 50 appearences and 50 IP to be elligible to qualify for Class B**
**Starters must still have a minimum 200 IP to be elligible to qualify for Class A, or 150 IP to be elligible to qualify for Class B**
Htter requirements:
There are two different possible point totals, and if a player reaches either, they are elligible. Why two? Because lead-off men and power hitters are completely different in ratings, and points need to be added in a different fashion to reach a set number.
There are two formulas here.
1.) Add "Talent" and "Overall" ratings including contact, gap, power, eye/discipline, and avoid k's. The total for Class A is 80, class B is 75.
2.) Add "Talent" and "Overall" ratings including contact, gap, eye/discipline, and avoid k's. That's still everything EXCEPT the power category. In place of it, add the player's running speed and stealing ability. Total for class A is 80, class B is 75.
Pitcher requirements:
Two here. One for MRs, one for SPs since MRs usually tend to be rated better.
Add "Talent" and "Overall" Stuff, Control, and Movement.
SPs:
Class A total: 55 points
Class B total: 45 points
MRs:
Class A total: 55 points
Class B total: 50 points
However, requirements for innings, like I said above, still applies.
Wade Davis.. Really? Not that I expect anyone to even bother giving him any sort of contract until I get squadush.
I would've resigned him if I was you. He really came on strong at the end for ya.
Rickie Weeks: 425 PA
Ratings Qualification A: 69 (< 75)
Ratings Qualification B: 72 (< 75)
damn, just missed class B.
I really don't have a problem listing Crawford, but I don't want to modify the rules to include him, and if I include him as is, I might as well include others who are close but missed out too...
Dave is dealing with it fine, so what's the big deal? Be happy with your Holliday comp. :angry:
Yeah... I just go with the flow.... it is what it is...
I'm more interested in seeing if we have a simple way for the future to ensure top performers get a little something extra in consideration... like I posted in the other thread
Dave, check the other thread. I'm actually really interested in that idea you posted.... interested enough to better comp completely.