Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bwitty24
Who are we waiting on? Leo and GF?
GiantsFan said he is staying out of voting since he helped put the deal together.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
So the deal may not be completely even...but it is by no means unfair.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bwitty24
So the deal may not be completely even...but it is by no means unfair.
That is your opinion.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
So you say it is COMPLETELY unfair?
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Yeah...I do. Ryan Braun is a 26 year old stud that is signed cheap for the next 6 years. That alone has value. Not to mention he's one of the better rated players in the league, and he is only 26. If he was 30, then this would be a whole different situation, but he isn't, he is only 26, and he has great ratings. Like I said earlier, I'm surprised this traded wasn't a quick vote down. I was shocked that GF thinks it's fair, and I'm surprised that others think it's good enough to pass. I just don't see this deal being anything except completely unfair.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Because of Braun's cheap contract and age combined with Flowers' age/underdevelopment I'm going to say Fail here.
I don't think it's as "obvious" of a fail as some are making it out to be, but those are the deciding factors for me.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
ok so this deal fails 2-4. i'll inform the participants and we'll get a new one.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CrazyEights
Yeah...I do. Ryan Braun is a 26 year old stud that is signed cheap for the next 6 years. That alone has value. Not to mention he's one of the better rated players in the league, and he is only 26. If he was 30, then this would be a whole different situation, but he isn't, he is only 26, and he has great ratings. Like I said earlier, I'm surprised this traded wasn't a quick vote down. I was shocked that GF thinks it's fair, and I'm surprised that others think it's good enough to pass. I just don't see this deal being anything except completely unfair.
Here's where I disagree Crazy. I don't think that these deals need to be "good enough to pass". They just have to NOT be "bad enough to fail". Do I think this trade was lopsided, yes. Do I think it was lopsided badly enough to fail, I was on the fence, but decided that it wasn't bad enough to fail it. Obviously, we all have opinions, and that's why we have a TC instead of commish rules. So, the deal fails, it's all good.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Can't wait for a crappy 4 star prospect to be added.
Re: Trade: CH(A)/MIL (vote count: 2-3)
Dam's trying to do that. I'm trying to talk him out of it