Poll 3: Fantasy Draft II

[Kingdom]

We're going to have to go in another direction with the poll. There was limited support for the original concept, so, if you actually voted that, would you honestly be fine with another option? If so, vote for it.


Benefits for no draft:
You get the original squad and get to show off your skills, and prove why you are better than Pat Gillick or the hosers who used to run KC.

Benefits for keeper draft:
Let's say we limit ourselves to 1-3, the draft will be good and we get to keep players we like or want to build around from the team we have chosen. Draft order would be determined by how good the players you kept are. So there is a chance it could reflect a real-life order, or maybe not. Depends. You wouldn't be forced to keep anyone, and if you didn't, that's an automatic high pick. If multiple people don't keep players, we'll do what the NBA does.

Benefits for complete auto draft:
No one knows who they'll get, it's that simple. As Providence A's has pointed out, the computer does not always draft by need. In fact, many times you have no idea what the hell the computer was thinking. But with that, you'd actually have to work on your team instead of sitting on a gold mine. Could this result in a lot of trades? Sure, more the merrier, the TC is ready to roll.

[Hammer]

the new hoser of kansas city wants to do it the hard way

[Kingdom]

I'd love to see that, KC built into a quality team.

[Molina00]

If we can only keep 1-3 players, then I say no draft. Just stick with originally rosters.

Btw, is Reds planning on using a different roster set?

[missionhockey21]

I am fine with an auto draft, but no draft will lead to a quicker start time IMO so I would rather have that.

[Kingdom]

I don't know. Depends on what else is out there.. No one has said they liked that patch, so it's likely.

[Molina00]

I sure hope we won't use this one. A lot of the Rangers I looked at are horrible. Teixeira was only 2 stars.

[Kingdom]

Texy had great potential, I'm sure the ratings only reflected his first half struggle.

[Fishercat]

I voted for auto to be different, but I'm fine with anything

[Providence A's]

shitty roster file aside, I think it has to be either keep the rosters or auto-pick city...any kind of live draft will just take forever and ever and ever and ever...and I think both keeping the rosters the same or auto-picking would be easy on the commissioner.

if there isn't a decent roster file, we may as well just use all made up chumps...that way no one can say player X is underrated and so on.

[General]

If we do no draft, I want to keep the team I called in, that being the White Sox.

[BrianDawkins]

no draft and cubbyfan rosters, *****es

[MarinersFan87]

I'm switching my vote to no draft, easiest that way and the D-Rays have a decent foundation anyway.

[General]

Hey Zito, if we're not doing a draft, I'm keeping the White Sox.

I switched to the Braves because Redsfan made it clear we're doing a fantasy draft.

[Providence A's]

where did Redsfan28 do that? he voted to keep rosters the same