Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: NFL and Players close to a deal

  1. #1

    NFL and Players close to a deal

    Link

    NEW YORK (AP) -- Talks continued Sunday between the NFL and its players union amid indications they were close to a deal that would avert the mass dumping of veterans.

    The negotiations, which had broken off Saturday, resumed when Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFL Players Association, flew back to New York after returning home to Washington. Reports from inside the bargaining room pointed to progress being made a day after things seemed bleak.
    One indication that a deal might be near was a decision by the league to move the deadline for trimming rosters and getting under the salary cap from 6 p.m. EST Sunday to 10 p.m.

    If there was no deal, the cap was to be set at $94.5 million. But a deal could increase it significantly, allowing teams to keep players they otherwise would have been forced to cut.

    Free agency is scheduled to begin at 12:01 a.m. Monday, but could be delayed if agreement is reached.

    These negotiations were by far the most difficult since the NFL and the NFL Players Association first agreed to free agency and a salary cap in 1992, ending years of labor unrest that included player strikes in 1982 and 1987. The contract has been extended several times since then, most of the time with ease.

    But this time, the players asked for a change in the system.

    Until now, they got their money primarily from television and ticket revenues. This time, they requested their share from all team revenues, including outside money generated by everything from parking to stadium naming rights.

    That led to difficult negotiations, in part because the teams themselves are having their own dispute over that money because of the disparity in outside money made by low-revenue and high-revenue teams. Union leaders had suggested that it would be hard to reach agreement on a labor contract until the owners settled their own differences.

    But in the end, they seemed ready to compromise, largely because of the pressure of impending free agency, which was supposed to begin last Friday but was put off for three days so the sides could continue talking. In fact, the talks seemed to be at a standstill last Thursday, when the owners took just 57 minutes to reject the union's last offer.

    But seven hours later, the sides reversed course, agreeing to extend the free-agent deadline for three days so they could continue bargaining. That came as teams who had planned for a larger salary cap were preparing to cut large numbers of veterans, including many aging Pro Bowlers.

    "Many of those players would have been cut anyway," Upshaw said Saturday, noting that veterans are cut every year but find jobs with other teams. This year, however, the extra cuts could glut the market, causing players to get less money even if they find jobs.
    Great news. Hopefully they get this deal done and NFL can continue on with a good salary cap in place and a good future in place.

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    Not anymore, unfortunately.

    From KFFL:

    NFL | Management wanted a three-day delay to salary cap compliance
    Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:46:48 -0800

    ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports NFL management wanted to extend the deadline to Wednesday, March 8, for team's to be in compliance with the NFL salary cap, but the players' union would only agree to a four-hour delay from the original 6 p.m. ET deadline.


    NFL | Labor talks break off again
    Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:41:49 -0800

    ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the NFL labor talks broke off once again about 6:30 p.m. Sunday, March 5. Both sides left the meeting not being optimistic of getting a deal done. "Unless there's a miracle - right now we're going forward with the current collective bargaining agreement," Mortensen said.

    http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl

  3. #3
    Damn really? Haven't heard that.

    That sucks. Damn it....hopefully they get a deal done before next season atleast.

    This offseason is going to be real boring.

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    No way this offseason ends up being boring; with all the free agents, shit's going to be insane.

    The report from KFFL happened about 40 minutes ago, I believe. I caught t on the ESPN news ticker and then found it on KFFL.

  5. #5
    Ah. I haven't really been watching TV at all today. I'm sure I'll catch it on later tonight when I watch ESPN.

    This offseason will be boring, because most teams won't have a lot of money to spend on free agents. A lot of money will be saved for the draft. Draft is going to be exciting. But really, you may see some older top players not play at all this season. Also, you'll see players having to accept lower salaries then ever before.

  6. #6
    Dusty sucks redsfan28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florence, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,351
    MLB ERA
    2.36
    Blog Entries
    1
    The deadline has been extended to Thursday. The latest offer from the players has been taken to the owners for a vote.
    rf28

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    It's amazing how many times this situation has flip flopped.

    I don't thnk the owners will agree to the current proposal and we'll probably be stalemated again.

  8. #8
    Hopefully the owners do agree to this deal, so the CBA can be inplace and everything will be just happy and dandy. Sick of this damn problem.......they're all rich bastards anyway, whats a couple hundred million.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •