http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnpO_RTSNmQ
Printable View
Okay then my choices are Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, a party who believes that any government intervention beyond the 1780s rendition of the Constitution (boring mfer Gary Johnson), and the Greens. Really America?!?! That's the best we can do with 300+ million people?!?!
So you don't like Gary Johnson because he's boring? Not being boring is what's getting Trump so many votes in the first place. This is a Presidential race, not America's Got Talent.
The Libertarian party doesn't believe in any form of government intervention for matters that intervene in the private lives of individuals, both economically as well as socially. I'm not sure how that's a bad thing.
Donald Trump's #RNCinCLE entrance is even better with The Undertaker's music #WWE https://t.co/tSkQP8nvd8 https://t.co/jHHvjTu4r0
I lost myself with the lights going out.
Now reportedly there are tapes of him using the n-word?
This is like watching your favorite team in an epic melt down. How bad can it get? Can it get any worse? You bet it can!
smh
I wonder who El Saber voted for, considering sabermetricians are all supposed to be progressive and shit, and his party's candidate is the political equivalent of Dave Stewart.
With the way many people are reacting you'd think 5000 atomic bombs immediately launched when the officially announced him and we're all living in Fallout 4 wastelands now.
You'll be ok. He's going to make America great again, like it was in the 50s before illegal immigrants, drugs, gangs and no God in schools (that's where America went wrong)
Haha... almost nothing could have been worse than Shillary and Wild Bill in the White House. I think?
Count me in as one of the suckers who bought into what FiveThirtyEight and the like predicted, that she would win in a landslide, when I should have remembered what Mach said: the more charismatic candidate has always won, dating back to JFK. Case in point: LBJ was a hillbilly but won because his opponent was Barry Freaking Goldwater.
It doesn't help that all the models pretty much assumed that turnout would mirror 2008 and 2012. That was never going to happen.
I think 538 was okay, it was your NY Times nonsense where things weren't based in reality. Though 70% seems like a lock (538's prediction), it's pretty much a 2/3 success rate.
I think he won by a percent in each of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. That's razor thin, but obviously, it doesn't matter how thin it was.