Jessica Alba to pose for Playboy says agent.

[nick]

april 5th fools

[DirtyKash]

L O L

[Providence A's]

Nick took it a little too far...

[browntown653]

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[HollywoodLeo]

April 5th fools?

You may as well have said "sike!"

[DirtyKash]

We need a smack-fest between nick and brewcrewrock.

[Providence A's]

Leo = Buzz Killington

[HollywoodLeo]

Yo Reginald!

[nick]

LOl

[DirtyKash]

I could write a very angry letter right now about HollywoodLeo, but I decided instead merely to express some constructive criticism. First off, I'm willing to accept that HollywoodLeo always sounds like he's reading a prepared speech. I'm even willing to accept that what I really want from him is an apology. But I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see HollywoodLeo embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. It makes me want to pursue virtue and knowledge, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that some day, in the far, far future, HollywoodLeo will realize that he has a deep conviction that he is beyond reproach. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how HollywoodLeo's spin doctors like to say, "We should all bear the brunt of HollywoodLeo's actions." Such frothy eloquence neither convinces nor satisfies me. If someone wants me to believe something reprehensible like that, that person will have to show me some concrete evidence. Meanwhile, I intend to show you that there are many roads leading to the defeat of HollywoodLeo's plans to enable sappy, flagitious lunatics to punch above their weight. I profess that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to shout back at HollywoodLeo's propaganda.

If this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to convert retreat into advance. Some people have indicated that HollywoodLeo's sole aspiration is apparently to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international escapism. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. It's also why I say that a great many of us don't want him to redefine success and obscure failure. But we feel a prodigious societal pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his wily, shabby snow jobs.

I will not quibble with HollywoodLeo as to whether or not every one of his promises to us was broken before the words were fully out of his mouth. Instead, I'll simply state that HollywoodLeo's "compromises" are complete drivel and leave it at that. You should not ask, "In view of his dictatorial publicity stunts, what does it make sense for us to do now?", but rather, "Is he hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine?". The latter question is the better one to ask because he fervently believes that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. This shows that he is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is HollywoodLeo so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? The best answer comes from HollywoodLeo himself. That is, if you pay careful attention to his naive indiscretions you'll indeed notice that we must show HollywoodLeo that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show him that we can complain about shallow lamebrains. Maybe then HollywoodLeo will realize that there is only one way to stop him from challenging all I stand for. We must make out of fools, wise people; out of fanatics, men of sense; out of idlers, workers; out of short-sighted scroungers, people who are willing to navigate a safe path between the Scylla of HollywoodLeo's intrusive apologues and the Charybdis of boosterism. Then together we can identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that declare that he can change his sullen ways. Together we can show the world that HollywoodLeo is intellectually dishonest in everything he says and does. Still, I recommend you check out some of HollywoodLeo's holier-than-thou attitudes and draw your own conclusions on the matter.

Some of HollywoodLeo's toadies once admitted—after considerable tergiversation—that yes, he had secretly plotted to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that he may be generating, to put it mildly. I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "In spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many otherwise intelligent people continue to believe, thanks to HollywoodLeo, that children should belong to the state." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. However, if HollywoodLeo were to trick them into fixing their compass on the wrong star they'd soon be so off-course that they'd actually be willing to help him display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations. As I see it, whenever he is blamed for conspiring to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs, he blames his helots. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help HollywoodLeo engulf the world in a dense miasma of racialism.

HollywoodLeo keeps stating over and over again that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that HollywoodLeo's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. I cannot promise not to be angry at him. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads HollywoodLeo—to marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits. Here, too, we can see how there are two types of people in this world. There are those who consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of exclusivism and there are those who build bridges where in the past all that existed were moats and drawbridges. HollywoodLeo fits neatly into the former category, of course. If he truly believes that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.

HollywoodLeo is extremely misguided. In fact, my handy-dandy Misguided-O-Meter confirms that I can't understand why HollywoodLeo has to be so sanctimonious. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside HollywoodLeo's head and is making him let down ladders that the stinking, possession-obsessed, and chauvinistic scramble to climb. It's a bit more likely, however, that when I hear his trained seals parrot the party line—that it's okay to enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth—I see them not as people but as machines. The appropriate noises are coming out of their larynges, but their brains are not involved as they would be if they were thinking about how HollywoodLeo's gofers suspect that the majority of disgusting pissants are heroes, if not saints. This is precisely the non-equation that HollywoodLeo is trying to patch together. What he's missing, as usual, is that the reasons that he gives for his conclusions clearly do not correspond with his real motives. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.

Cynical irreligionism is the shadow cast on society by HollywoodLeo's opuscula, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. Those of you who thought that HollywoodLeo was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise because HollywoodLeo recently announced his plans to destroy the natural beauty of our parks and forests. I am reminded of the quote, "It is no accident that he should think for himself." This comment is not as vicious as it seems because if you were to try to tell HollywoodLeo's hangers-on that his remonstrations are impertinent in theory and conniving in practice, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that if I had to choose between chopping onions and helping HollywoodLeo make people suspicious of those who speak the truth, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that HollywoodLeo is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul.

To perpetuate the myth that big emotions come from big words is an injustice. HollywoodLeo decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. I fully intend to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with HollywoodLeo. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this mark. Even so, if HollywoodLeo got his way, he'd be able to lower our standard of living. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that.

I, not being one of the many vitriolic knuckle-draggers of this world, doubtlessly think that we need to do more to guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by HollywoodLeo and his coalition. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as I don't care what others say about HollywoodLeo. He's still delirious, acrimonious, and he intends to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on officious deconstructionism. Being shielded from the consequences of his bad judgment and bad behavior has made him careless. How does he deal with this fascinating piece of information? He thoroughly ignores it.

We must give to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. Before HollywoodLeo spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that whenever he announces that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold, his chums applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that HollywoodLeo wants all of us to believe that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Now that I've said what I had to say, I should remark that this letter may not endear me to some people. Indeed, it may even cost me a friend or two. However, friends do not let friends get trampled by uneducated mattoids like HollywoodLeo. The truth is the truth and we pay a steep price whenever we ignore it.

[HollywoodLeo]

I am angry. Angry that events have transpired that lead me to write this statement. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what DirtyKash's particularly unholy form of Stalinism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of high-handed politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. Looking at it on the bright side, DirtyKash hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that DirtyKash has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, DirtyKash's vows of equality did little more than convince people that DirtyKash has been known to "prove" statistically that going through the motions of working is the same as working. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, DirtyKash's "proof" demonstrates only that he insists that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems but it boils down essentially to this: Letting DirtyKash lead to the destruction of the human race is a recipe for disaster. Furthermore, contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to look at our situation realistically and from a viewpoint that takes in the whole picture.

For those of us who make our living trying to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence, it is important to consider that he claims that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. I warrant that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I disagree both with DirtyKash's point and with the way he makes it. But you knew that already. So let me add that I would like to comment on DirtyKash's attempt to associate mandarinism with jujuism. There is no association.

DirtyKash's torchbearers realize that if their aims were sufficiently revealed, an informed public would have the power to upset their well-laid plans. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. Perhaps DirtyKash is off his trolley, but remember that the concepts underlying his libidinous, baleful offhand remarks are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea—that the heavens revolve around the Earth—was wrong, just as DirtyKash's idea that officialism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society is wrong. To most people, the idea that I don't expect everyone to agree with me is so endemic, so long ingrained, that when others conclude that he is completely unaware of the difference between a correlation and a causation, this merely seems to be affirming an obvious truth.

We should act and act fast. Surely, DirtyKash is not too besotted to realize that. He presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. DirtyKash is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors meddlesome, cocky cretins. And here we have the ultimate irony because DirtyKash wants to weaken family ties. Faugh.

To operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and brown-nosing racialism has never been something that I wanted to do. Never. According to the latest scientific evidence, DirtyKash has studiously avoided being contaminated by the facts. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would because I can't understand why he has to be so snooty. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside his head and is making him expose and neutralize his enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. It's a bit more likely, however, that if he had done his homework, he'd know that we can no longer afford to do nothing about his yawping accusations. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and point out that the emperor has no clothes on.

If we change the world for the better then the sea of neocolonialism, on which DirtyKash so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. The foregoing analysis is self-evident even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should rake him over the coals for challenging all I stand for while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. His statements such as "We should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.

In hearing about DirtyKash's blanket statements, one gets the distinct impression that if DirtyKash succeeds in his attempt to lobotomize everyone caught thinking an independent thought, it'll have to be over my dead body. Almost without exception, only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to tear down his fortress of nihilism. But the first step is to acknowledge that it would be charitable of me not to mention that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of DirtyKash's declamations are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that when it comes to his projects, I sincerely avouch that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. The sooner we do that the better because even if one is opposed to feral Chekism (and I am), then surely, he motivates people to join his faction by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What DirtyKash really wants to do is abridge our basic civil liberties. That's why DirtyKash keeps stating over and over again that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that I never used to be particularly concerned about DirtyKash's overgeneralizations. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that I'm sure DirtyKash wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness? In other words, isn't he the conformism-oriented grifter who recently wanted to distort the facts? To turn that question around, what does he hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of what I call exploitative bullies? I don't pretend to know the answer but I do know that he has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that creating needed understanding is best achieved in a calm, rational environment. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why DirtyKash had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us classism, denominationalism, and masochism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that if a cogent, logical argument entered DirtyKash's brain, no doubt a concussion would result.

While I trust that this audience shares my indignation at DirtyKash, DirtyKash finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind DirtyKash that every time he tries, DirtyKash gets increasingly successful in his attempts to make our country spiritually blind. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well. DirtyKash wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, I once overheard DirtyKash say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? DirtyKash said that black is white and night is day. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that self-deceiving carpers are more susceptible to his brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle DirtyKash puts them in. They then lose all recollection that DirtyKash either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. He even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to waste natural resources.

Although DirtyKash has never read carefully anything I've written, a well-respected professor at a nearby university, writing with the dispassionate objectivity that is a precondition of all scientific knowledge, has recently concluded that his associates operate secretly so as not to excite suspicion. To cap that off, he can't fool me. I've met rummy spongers before, so I know that DirtyKash is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that we can stop faddism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for raffish stool pigeons. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how xenophobic DirtyKash is. You can't do it. Not only that, but he is secretly planning to establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent DirtyKash has tried to progressively narrow the sphere of human freedom. The other is whether or not DirtyKash is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence he writes is filled with needlessly long words like "heterochromatization" and "crystallographically". Either DirtyKash is deliberately trying to confuse us or else he's secretly scheming to change the course of history.

If DirtyKash thinks his smear tactics represent progress, he should rethink his definition of progress. He frequently engages in violent fantasies involving what I call namby-pamby, deluded beatniks. It follows from this that it is an actuarial certainty that DirtyKash will engulf the world in a dense miasma of cronyism by the next full moon. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that his plaints are some of the most unbridled, insipid, and polyloquent I've ever encountered? All of this once again proves the old saying that DirtyKash is an expert at shameless name-dropping.

[nick]

you're both gay!

[HollywoodLeo]

Oh yeah?

Well...

Well...

You smell like broccoli!

[nick]

heh heh heh...

[Slyder]

heh heh heh...

Wheres my German to English translation dictionary... I know its around here somewhere...

Ah screw it.