Bonds* hits HR today

[HollywoodLeo]

**** Barry Bonds, how many times has he won a World Series? Bernie Williams is 7000x the man Bonds'll ever be.

Lamest argument in the history of sports debate.

[browntown653]

Charles Barkley all have 0 NBA finals. So are you going to degrade those guys aswell?

Hey now...Charles beat Dick Bavetta in a foot race, that's more glory than 12 championships can buy.

[love_that_reefer]

So having more muscle doesn't give you more power?

Just because it still takes good hand-eye coordination to hit a baseball coming at 90 mph doesn't mean steroids can't help you hit home runs if you have that hand-eye coordination.

And i'm not even saying Bonds is on roids, i'm just saying roids can help you hit HRs, and to suggest they can't is being ignorant.

The knock on roids especially HGH is that is keeps your energy up and not necessarily build muscle. Same thing goes for speed. Both will help turn on that 95 mph fastball but you have to hit it first.

Drugs are bad um-k

[HollywoodLeo]

The knock on roids especially HGH is that is keeps your energy up and not necessarily build muscle. Same thing goes for speed.

Perhaps not directly, but people can recover faster when using roids...which means they can go to the gym everyday, vice every other day.

If roids don't build muscle, how come anyone who takes them ends up with a lot of muscle?

Both will help turn on that 95 mph fastball but you have to hit it first.

Of course you have to hit the ball first. That's why any joe blow with an under the counter roid prescription doesn't sign on with a baseball team and break home run records.

But, if you have the ability to hit the ball, which Bonds has always had, the added muscle can give you the ability to hit the ball farther.

And if you're already hitting the ball far to begin with....you just might approach 755.

[love_that_reefer]

Perhaps not directly, but people can recover faster when using roids...which means they can go to the gym everyday, vice every other day.

If roids don't build muscle, how come anyone who takes them ends up with a lot of muscle?

You answered your own question. Dead issue

[realmofotalk]

And i'm not even saying Bonds is on roids,

Yes, you are.

i'm just saying roids can help you hit HRs, and to suggest they can't is being ignorant.

Hit HRs? Sounds like what Bonds does best. Yeah, you are saying Bonds is on roids.

[HollywoodLeo]

Yes, you are.

Hit HRs? Sounds like what Bonds does best. Yeah, you are saying Bonds is on roids.

I like how you convinignently leave the latter end of that first quote out that sates " i'm just saying roids can help you hit HRs, and to suggest they can't is being ignorant."

I'm saying roids can help someone hit home runs, that doesn't mean I'm stating that everyone that hits home runs is on roids.

[love_that_reefer]

Quote:
Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo
And i'm not even saying Bonds is on roids,
Yes, you are.
Quote:
i'm just saying roids can help you hit HRs, and to suggest they can't is being ignorant.
Hit HRs? Sounds like what Bonds does best. Yeah, you are saying Bonds is on roids.

Hilarious

[HollywoodLeo]

Hilarious

I guess with your response to his post you agree with his highly flawed interpretation of my posts?

Try making a real counter-argument next time.

[love_that_reefer]

Wasn't arguing and he is dead on balls right about what he said!!! You misinterpreted what he is saying retard!

[HollywoodLeo]

Wasn't arguing and he is dead on balls right about what he said!!! You misinterpreted what he is saying retard!

So by stating that roids can help someone hit home runs i'm stating that Bonds is on roids because he hits a lot of home runs?

What planet am I living on where people who operate on this kind of logic are calling me a retard?

Does this mean I'm saying Alfonso Soriano is on roids as well? What about A-Rod? I also apparently think Vladamir Guererro is on roids? I think Mike Schmidt was on roids? Because I say roids can help you hit home runs this means I think someone who hits a lot of home runs is/was on roids?

No, mofo (and apparently you as well) made that idiotic conclusion, not I.

[love_that_reefer]

You already said you thought Bonds was on roids which makes it hilarious that you would even say that dumb dumb!!

[realmofotalk]

I like how you convinignently leave the latter end of that first quote out that sates " i'm just saying roids can help you hit HRs, and to suggest they can't is being ignorant."

The latter end of your sentence wasn't important to my interpretation.

I'm saying roids can help someone hit home runs, that doesn't mean I'm stating that everyone that hits home runs is on roids.

Of course not. You're just saying roids help Bonds hit home runs.

[HollywoodLeo]

You already said you thought Bonds was on roids which makes it hilarious that you would even say that dumb dumb!!

I've always maintained that Bonds could be on Roids, and that the sudden rise in his power production in the latter end of his career backs up this speculation.

I am not wavering from this standpoint in this thread, I still think it's very possible the guy is on roids, but it has also not been proven, short of that whole "cream" fiasco.

Again, I have never stated Bonds is on roids like it's a fact, I have merely argued that he can be and showed circumstantial evidence that supports that theory.

Anytime I talk about Bonds and roids I'm always sure to add "allegedly" before I mention him being on roids. I'm not doing this to be a smartass, i'm doing it because we don't know for sure if he's on roids, he's only accused of by some of being on roids...thus allegedly.

Furthermore, in this thread I never even stated that Bonds could be on roids, despite mofo taking two separate quotes from two separate posts way out of context.

But if you want to keep misinterpreting my posts because it gives you joy to be able to throw 2nd grader insults at someone like "dum dum" and "retard" feel free to keep doing so.

[HollywoodLeo]

The latter end of your sentence wasn't important to my interpretation.

It was important because it clarifies exactly what you're misinterpreting about my posts.

Of course not. You're just saying roids help Bonds hit home runs.

I don't see anywhere in this thread where I said roids are helping Bonds hit home runs.

And before you quote it, I didn't state Bonds was on roids when I said "roids might help you approach 755"

I was merely using Bonds as an example under the pretense of "if he's on roids" ("if" being the keyword there)

If you can't see what was being said I apologize for your lack of ability to comprehend the English language.