Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 84 of 84

Thread: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

  1. #76
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo View Post
    I disagree
    march '08 that was pretty much true......now he's better
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  2. #77
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    LOLno. I'm pretty sure Kershaw>Latos going forward.

  3. #78
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Kershaw has a CY Young caliber year and suddenly the guy who's spent the past 3 or 4 years whining about taking him instead of Lincecum is bumping old threads to brag about it.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  4. #79
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    True, in a perfect world, I'd still trade this year's Cy Young award to have Lincecum on the 2008-09 Dodger teams. But I never said I'd rather have Hochevar, Reynolds, Lincoln, Morrow, or Miller.

    Not my fault you took my whining to mean that I would agree that Latos is better.

  5. #80
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    If you really want to go back 3 or 4 years, I could direct you to where you once said the Twins could surely do better than Kemp+Kershaw for Johan Santana.

  6. #81
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Finally, why shouldn't I brag about something positive about my team for a change? I've had enough of the Schadenfreude that you all experience at my expense.

  7. #82
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    Quote Originally Posted by realmofotalk View Post
    If you really want to go back 3 or 4 years, I could direct you to where you once said the Twins could surely do better than Kemp+Kershaw for Johan Santana.
    True. But in my defense, I had no idea Johan would go from the best pitcher in the game to an injury prone scrub almost instantaneously.

  8. #83
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Padres are better on paper

  9. #84
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    Quote Originally Posted by realmofotalk View Post
    If you really want to go back 3 or 4 years, I could direct you to where you once said the Twins could surely do better than Kemp+Kershaw for Johan Santana.
    I'm pretty sure I actually bumped that myself to laugh at myself. not sure if it was before or after this post, however.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •