Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 84

Thread: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

  1. #46
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Giants have no place in the discussion but nice try I would still take the Dodgers rotation over the Padres and take Saito over Hoffman. The bullpens are close too but I give the Padres that one. Offense? I gotta give it to the dodgers as well.

  2. #47
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Giants have no place in the discussion but nice try I would still take the Dodgers rotation over the Padres and take Saito over Hoffman. The bullpens are close too but I give the Padres that one. Offense? I gotta give it to the dodgers as well.
    How can you pass over one of the best closers of all time over a player who's been in the big leagues what 1,2 years?

  3. #48
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Quote Originally Posted by Rufio181 View Post
    How can you pass over one of the best closers of all time over a player who's been in the big leagues what 1,2 years?
    Because that closer is 40 years old.

    It's been the same story every year since 2004. Everyone thinks it's finally Trevor's time to burn out and he proves them wrong.

    One of these years they're going to be right, though.

    Hopefully not this year.

    Saito is pretty damn good, though, so it's not like he made a dumb pick. (Such as Chan Ho Park over Randy Wolf)
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  4. #49
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    If we are talking careers of course I would go with Hoffman. Right here in the now I have to take Saito. Look at his numbers. Saito's not exactly young either but he still has good stuff and is the better closer right now.\

    I would take you Leo over Randy Wolf. The guy's a mess!!

  5. #50
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    You talk about Wolf like he's Darrel May or Scott Elarton

    He's nothing great, hell he's actually kinda bad, but he's not the horrible lucky to have a rotation spot pitcher you make him out to be.

    He has a better career ERA, WHIP, and ERA+ than both Esteban Loiaza and Chan Ho Park and he's younger than them (albeit not by much) yet you think Wolf drags a rotation down a lot more than either of them does.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  6. #51
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Wolf is like Elarton and May now!! What about him tells you he's good. I seriously doubt Loaiza makes the rotation and the same hopefully goes for Wolf. Rusch is outpitching Wolf. Point is I find the Dodgers rotation better.

    And I love how you had to take the Crystal thing to the worst extreme. It couldn't be that he wasted an AB from a deserving player.

  7. #52
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    You're making the mistake that I think Wolf is good.

    I just don't think he's as horrible as you're making him out to be.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  8. #53
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Wolf was racking up quality starts for LA up to the end of May, but then he couldn't quite keep it up without getting great run support, and then, of course, his shoulder gave out. Overall, he's not horrible, but yet another guy whom you have to take the good along with the bad.

    To Reefer: Loaiza has the 5th rotation spot virtually wrapped up, pending a sobriety test.

  9. #54
    Hall of Famer GiantsFanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sparks, Nevada, United States
    Posts
    2,716
    MLB ERA
    4.81

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    If he fails his sobriety test, he can always knock on Omar Minaya's door.


  10. #55
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    I would take you Leo over Randy Wolf.
    It's always been my fantasy to pitch in the major leagues.

    Maybe I can convince the Giants to allow me to pitch an inning of ST so I can ruin Tim Lincecum's career.


    Just a joke, don't take it seriously
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  11. #56
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    No Leo because that would be ****ing retarded to let someone on the field who shouldn't be there.

  12. #57
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Billingsley and Clayton Kershaw are going to be the "pocket aces" in a couple of years.
    Ugh, this reeks of the Jesse Foppert and Jerome Williams star treatment jinx. Even if Bills and Clay become just "pocket No. 2's", I'll take that.

  13. #58
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Excuse me but there was never any Foppert, Williams talk of them being the future of anything. Williams was a good story when he came up but no one projected him to be more than a third starter at best and no one ever gave Foppert the future ace label. Realistic projections when they first came in were Foppert as a #2 and Williams a #4. I was even asking for a Foppert trade for a closer when he first came up because I didn't see what the big deal was.

  14. #59
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    Foppert was labeled the top pitching prospect in all of baseball back in 2003. Williams' ceiling wasn't as high as Foppert's but Williams was thought to be the more polished pitcher.

  15. #60
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres rotation = #1 in the majors, according to mlb.com

    But neither were thought of to be aces of this staff. #2 and #4 were what they were thought of when they were coming up. Then Foppert actually pitched in the big leagues and that soon went away. Same went for Williams.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •