Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 223

Thread: 2008 Payroll

  1. #61
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Yeah pop wasn't the right word. Power was the word. Gonzelez, Greene and a rookie should provide all the strikeouts you want. Even with those added players and your so called predictions from existing players, it's still not that much of an improvement offensively. But hey, **** it! Better chance for the Giants to potentially take third in the division.

  2. #62
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Even if the Padres go into 2008 with figuratively the same team as they had in 2007 it's not the forgone conclusion that they finish the same in the standings that you've been making it out to be.

    Just sayin
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  3. #63
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Not improving while the Dbacks, Dodgers, and Rockies will most likely be a lot better because of all their young talent isn't promising.

  4. #64
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Crisp is only an upgrade defensively over Cameron. Fukedome will produce about the same as LF did last season so the only good thing would be one LFer rather than four LFers. And saying he would produce the same is being generous. NL West is stacked with good pitching, far better than what Japan has to offer and playing in PetCo will hurt. Whomever is playing second won't provide the offense needed. This team the way you have it will not be any better than last year's team.
    How do you know what the 2nd baseman will provide? It's a little premature to start saying someone won't provide offense, especially with Antonelli as he's had 0 major league time. From the numbers he's shown through AA, I think he'll do quite well.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  5. #65
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Reefer, there have been 0 free agents added to any teams as of yet, there isn't 1 team that has a set roster for 2008. When the 2007 season started, did anyone pick 2 NL West teams to face off in the NLCS? NO. People kept saying Arizona would falter down the stretch, they never did.

    Once Spring Training rolls around, then we can start talking about where next year's team is going to finish, or any team for that matter. The players that PFF has talked about adding will upgrade this team from last year.

    While we're at it, there's been a lot of talk about Noah Lowry or Tim Linecum being traded....and that helps the Giants how?
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  6. #66
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    To be fair to Reefer he wasn't really predicting how the Padres will perform, but rather predicting how they would perform should they set the roster that PFF posted.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  7. #67
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    I think it's a little premature to predict how additions to this team will perform. But, that's just me. All I'm worried about at this point is to upgrade the team as a whole.

    Pitching:

    Sign Clement
    Trade for Prior
    Resign Doug Brocail
    talk to Boras about Eric Gagne

    Offense:

    Trade for Coco Crisp
    Sign Mark Loretta
    Sign Geoff Blum

    That's it for me, I just completely blanked on the rest of what I wanted to do. Apparently it's been a longer day than I thought. Please add to that if you have ideas.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  8. #68
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Maddux's 10m option p/u........no change........but one down, many to go....

    1B Adrian Gonzales $0.750m
    2B Antonelli $0.380m
    SS Khalil Greene $4.0m ***Arbitration Eligible
    3B Kevin Kouzmanoff $0.380m
    C Bard $1.5mRF Brian Giles $9.0m
    CF Crisp at $4m
    LF Fukudome at $10M

    SP Jake Peavy $6.0m
    SP Chris Young $2.5m
    SP Greg Maddux $10.0m
    SP $5m spent on fliers for 3 guys like Clement, and then trade for Prior
    SP Hensley, Cassel, Germano, LeBlanc $0.380-0.490m

    RP Trevor Hoffman $7.5m
    RP Heath Bell $0.380m
    RP Cla Meredith $0.380m
    RP Thatcher $0.380mRP Hampson $0.380m
    RP Cameron / long releiver $0.380m

    BENCH Blum $0.900m
    BENCH Hairston $0.500m
    BENCH Lane ? $1m
    BENCH Loretta ? $2m ( competes with Ant to start, or backs up IF with Blum )
    BENCH catcher ?
    BENCH ???

    $25.32m added


    Total Payroll = $67.36m

    Leaves $3-8m to fill in the bench (or contracts that I've made errors with or been slightly short on, keep in mind I might have overshot others so it could be a wash of errors, either way I think it's probably close)
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  9. #69
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    How do you know what the 2nd baseman will provide? It's a little premature to start saying someone won't provide offense, especially with Antonelli as he's had 0 major league time. From the numbers he's shown through AA, I think he'll do quite well.
    I don't know but I do know it won't be enough to get you guys over the huge hump in the NL West. Giles + Blum=Antonelli. Like you said, He has zero MLB time. Just being realistic.

  10. #70
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    Reefer, there have been 0 free agents added to any teams as of yet, there isn't 1 team that has a set roster for 2008. When the 2007 season started, did anyone pick 2 NL West teams to face off in the NLCS? NO. People kept saying Arizona would falter down the stretch, they never did.

    Once Spring Training rolls around, then we can start talking about where next year's team is going to finish, or any team for that matter. The players that PFF has talked about adding will upgrade this team from last year.

    While we're at it, there's been a lot of talk about Noah Lowry or Tim Linecum being traded....and that helps the Giants how?
    No free agents have been signed yes we know but teams like the Dbacks, Dodgers and Rockies don't have many holes to fill and will rely on their great young talent. Yes that same talent that got the Dabcks and Rockies into the playoffs. Yes some people did think two teams could come out of the West as everyone knew it would be a strong one. I didn't but wished I did. The players PFF will not upgrade anything which is what I have been saying. The Padres need run producers and his guys aren't that. Same shit different day.

    Now to answer your question, Lincecum is not being shopped but Lowry is. Giants need offense and holes to fill worse than the Padres. Sabean will listen all day long to offers for Cain and Lincecum but will have to be blown away by a Cabrera or Santana or someoen of that stature. Lowry makes sense to move because we do have a lot of young pitching and Lowry is a solid #3 pitcher. We can get a quality bat for him which we need. Not a lot of FA's are going to want to go to SF because they aren't going to be contenders in 08.

  11. #71
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    -Fukudome IMO is a massive upgrade on both sides of the ball
    -Crisp is a slight upgrade on both sides of the ball, but we take a hit on HR's
    -Kouz needs pick up where he left off and I think he will, that alone will be huge
    -AGon should continue to progress into a great overall player
    -KG needs to pick up where he left off at the end of the year controlling the strikezone better and driving the shit out of the ball.

    These things happen and our lineup is substantially better..........keep in mind we had nothing from our 3bag until week 5 of the season........and LF was an abyss forever.......those two things being addressed could equal far more wins ......

    My big concern is can our pitching duplicate efforts.......if they can't.......we're in trouble........this roster is better, that lineup would be better........but if our pitching doesn't show up like last year will it matter ?
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  12. #72
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    I don't know but I do know it won't be enough to get you guys over the huge hump in the NL West. Giles + Blum=Antonelli. Like you said, He has zero MLB time. Just being realistic.
    Reefer, you just countered yourself. You don't know how he will produce, but you know it won't be enough. If you don't know how he's going to produce, how can you say it won't be enough? Either you know or you don't.

    Look, yes, Antonelli is coming into this season as, possibly, a rookie. From what Grady Fuson has been saying and the belief the Padres' front office has in him, I think he'll do quite well. And to sit there and say Giles+Blum=Antonelli is ludicrous at this point.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  13. #73
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    [quote=love_that_reefer;320847]No free agents have been signed yes we know but teams like the Dbacks, Dodgers and Rockies don't have many holes to fill and will rely on their great young talent. Yes that same talent that got the Dabcks and Rockies into the playoffs. Yes some people did think two teams could come out of the West as everyone knew it would be a strong one. I didn't but wished I did. The players PFF will not upgrade anything which is what I have been saying. The Padres need run producers and his guys aren't that. Same shit different day.[quote]

    I believe I said noone predicted to NL West teams in the NLCS, not just the playoffs. Because, the preseason predictions I've seen, I haven't seen 1 that had 2 NL West teams in the NLCS.

    Now, though PFF and I disagree on some of the players we want to bring in, I think the idea of upgrading the team remains the same. If the Padres upgrade their rotation by making a trade for Mark Prior, sign a Matt Clement, and on top of that, you get a completely healthy Clay Hensley. With just those 3 additions, there's no question this team just got better. If they can upgrade their rotation, keep their bullpen just as strong as last season, then add a Coco Crisp, Matt Antonelli, Mark Loretta and maybe, just maybe an Andruw Jones for 1 year, that's definetely a better team than last season.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  14. #74
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Mark Prior? The same Mark Prior that has played in 9 games in two seasons and has only sniffed 200 IP once? Clement too doesn't necessarily make any upgrade. Jones will be interesting but doubt Petco is the cure for his offensive woes. The Padres had zero .300 hitters. How is Crisp, Jones, Antonelli or Fukudome going to solve this? I do expect Kouz to progress but probably won't see a hike in Gonzo's production. With no one hitting around him, I wouldn't pitch to him with men on base. Crisp gives you better defensive with little speed on the base paths and a mediocre OBP, Fukudome gives you a Giles type player with better defense and Antonelli gives you a AA second baseman. I guess the point of all this is the Padres can and will do a lot better than this and it is hilarious that you guys think this is the best you can do.

  15. #75
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: 2008 Payroll

    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    Reefer, you just countered yourself. You don't know how he will produce, but you know it won't be enough. If you don't know how he's going to produce, how can you say it won't be enough? Either you know or you don't.

    Look, yes, Antonelli is coming into this season as, possibly, a rookie. From what Grady Fuson has been saying and the belief the Padres' front office has in him, I think he'll do quite well. And to sit there and say Giles+Blum=Antonelli is ludicrous at this point.
    He will be an upgrade defensively and hit for a better average but won't give the production you need. I now see why Stansberry was favored by ESPN, more of a proven comodity.

Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •