Page 22 of 25 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 370

Thread: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

  1. #316
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Since that's not the case.....what? A bench comes in handy to fill holes and pinch hit and beyond that......what? I see it as spot on. No impact players and no help beyond '08. Just be thankful the Dodgers, Dbacks and Rockies didn't do much either.
    Your implication was that the Padres did nothing but improve the bench and that this means they didn't improve the team or their chances to win.

    That would be spot on if the bench, indeed, had zero impact on the team's ability to win.

    Since that is not the case and the bench can be integral to a team's ability to win....especially in the NL....your assessment is not spot on.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  2. #317
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    I never said that but ok. I said you guys improved your bench but did nothing to really push you guys over the top. Sorry if you can't handle it.

  3. #318
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Why must I be "incapable" of "handling" anything just because I disagree with you? Why can't it just mean that I disagree with you? Why can't you handle that?

    You said that these moves don't really change anything...if they improve the Padres chances to win they change something. So if you don't think they change anything you are, at the very least, implying that it doesn't improve their chances to win...whether that was your intention or not.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  4. #319
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Because you make a huge deal of a small thing. That's why.

    Ok because you are getting lost. You improved your bench. Great job! The starters are lacking. Not a good job. Your bench can only do so much and don't win as many games as the starters. And once more, no impact players means more of the same. Nothing got this team over the top! Want to see how a good bench doesn't help that much, look at the '07 Giants!!!

  5. #320
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Responding to something you say that I disagree with is "making a big deal out of it"?

    Whatever, I'll keep that in mind the next time I feel the need to have a civil baseball debate with you.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  6. #321
    Future All-American
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    570
    AA ERA
    2.42

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Girls, girls, girls, it's okay to agree to disagree, now hug and makeup...

  7. #322
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    In case people weren't paying attention to the Padres 1st half.........our bench played a huge role in our 1st half success.......so if you don't think upgrading a bench helps a team........I'd suggest you really don't know what you're talking about.

    Did we need to address other areas.......of course.......we didn't
    Did we need to address our bench.......hell yes........and we did

    Its still possible to make a deal after the deadline......less likely, but possible still.........
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  8. #323
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Bench wasn't where you needed help thus not solving the problem.

    Leo, we were having a civil debate. Can't handle it?

  9. #324
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    The bench needed huge help.........wtf are you talking about.......our bench was atrocious........know what you're talking about when you talk about the Padres .......otherwise........troll off to your own room
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  10. #325
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Bench wasn't where you needed help thus not solving the problem.
    Apparently you weren't following the Padres all too well.

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Leo, we were having a civil debate. Can't handle it?
    I can handle it perfectly well up until someone starts suggesting that I can't handle it just because I'm disagreeing with them.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  11. #326
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    You just got Hillenbrand and Hairston to go along with Bard, Cruz Jr., and Blum. The bench wasn't really a pressing need and the Padres needed more help elsewhere.

  12. #327
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Hillenbrand is in Portland, Hairston is decent at best, and Blum sucks.

    Mackowiak can play more positions than all 3 and Ensberg has shown in the past that he can be real good.

    My original counter-argument, however, came after you, yourself, said the bench was improved by the moves that were just made....but turned around and implied that improving the bench (and thus the team's ability to win) doesn't change anything.

    It was more of a conceptual statement that I was counter arguing.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  13. #328
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Russell Branyan can do anything Ensberg can do. I don't think improving the bench pushes this team to the next level, yes you are correct in saying that. Maybe if this team got a good everyday second baseman, I would say something different but get a bunch of utility guys doesn't equal a division crown IMO.

  14. #329
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    You just got Hillenbrand and Hairston to go along with Bard, Cruz Jr., and Blum. The bench wasn't really a pressing need and the Padres needed more help elsewhere.
    You can add Mackowiak and Ensberg to that list too Reefer.

    Oh, how's Zito working out for ya?
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  15. #330
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Official 2007 Trade Rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    It's cool. I knew it wouldn't happen just like I knew Zito wouldn't happen. Key words are knew, not thought
    Turns out, you were right....this time. I don't mind being wrong, I really had the feeling that Dunn was going to be here, but not for the price Cincinnati was asking, which was ludicrious.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

Page 22 of 25 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •