Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 95

Thread: Predictions for 2007

  1. #31
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60
    The one thing the Padres can NOT afford to do is start off slow this season, because if the Dodgers put distance between themselves and the Padres, I think the Dodgers have the talent to stay in front. I think the Padres need to stay right with them step for step.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  2. #32
    Padres Fan In The UK
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    82
    Rookie ERA
    1.24

    Padres

    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    The one thing the Padres can NOT afford to do is start off slow this season, because if the Dodgers put distance between themselves and the Padres, I think the Dodgers have the talent to stay in front. I think the Padres need to stay right with them step for step.
    Yeah, we need to start straight out of the gate

  3. #33
    Minor Leaguer BFISA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    30
    Rookie ERA
    1.25
    I can't recall the projected started outfield for the foogin dodgers, but they don't strike fear in me.

    I'm not much inta predictin, but I'm sure the Pads'll do well-wasn't so many seasons ago when a .500 season would be cause for celebration.

    Go Pads!!

  4. #34
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    Luis Gonzalez, Juan Pierre and Andre Ethier is the projected Dodgers OF. The Dodgers offense has no real source of power outside of Kent but this has speed and will score runs. Plus with that pitching staff, they won't have to score 5 runs a game to win.

  5. #35
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5
    They have Matt Kemp waiting in the wings if Gonzo falters. And when Derek Lowe slumps they will need to score 5 runs.

  6. #36
    Padres Fan In The UK
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    82
    Rookie ERA
    1.24

    Padres

    Quote Originally Posted by BFISA View Post
    I can't recall the projected started outfield for the foogin dodgers, but they don't strike fear in me.

    I'm not much inta predictin, but I'm sure the Pads'll do well-wasn't so many seasons ago when a .500 season would be cause for celebration.

    Go Pads!!
    The Dodgers shouldn't cause us any problems


    Go Pads!!!

  7. #37
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60
    Let's not kid ourselves, the Dodgers should be able to stay towards the top of the division most of the year. The only way I could see them faltering is if they the injury bug bites either Jason Schmidt or Derek Lowe.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  8. #38
    Padres Fan In The UK
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    82
    Rookie ERA
    1.24
    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    Let's not kid ourselves, the Dodgers should be able to stay towards the top of the division most of the year. The only way I could see them faltering is if they the injury bug bites either Jason Schmidt or Derek Lowe.
    They will be snapping on our heals for most of the year. we just need to stay in form and not to lose "easy" games

  9. #39
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14
    A healthy Nomar (lol) is another source of power for the Dodgers....and I think they will have a pesky offense...nothing that really scares anyone, but they are going to have some speed, some power, some youth and some vets....it's a strange mix IMO, but one that could be nasty to teams with suspect offense......like US
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  10. #40
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60
    Nomar is a good offensive player, no question about it, but I think he's going to spend a lot of time on the DL.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  11. #41
    Padres Fan In The UK
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    82
    Rookie ERA
    1.24

    Padres

    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    Nomar is a good offensive player, no question about it, but I think he's going to spend a lot of time on the DL.
    We certainly hope so

  12. #42
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60
    I'm interested to see if the Dodgers ever move Brad Penny. I think he's still good enough to at least be the #5 guy in their rotation instead of Brett Tomko.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  13. #43
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan View Post
    I'm interested to see if the Dodgers ever move Brad Penny. I think he's still good enough to at least be the #5 guy in their rotation instead of Brett Tomko.
    At least be the #5 guy? Brad Penny? The only Dodgers' starting pitcher to have pitched in last year's All-Star Game is, according to you, at best a #5 guy?!

  14. #44
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    Penny fell apart after the ASG IIRC

    He's still their #2 or 3, though, depending on how you rank Lowe.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  15. #45
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60
    Quote Originally Posted by realmofotalk View Post
    At least be the #5 guy? Brad Penny? The only Dodgers' starting pitcher to have pitched in last year's All-Star Game is, according to you, at best a #5 guy?!
    Dude, don't take that personally, I said "at least" not "at best". I just don't understand why they're trying to move him. I agree with you, he's still a very effective pitcher, which is why moving him would leave me scratching my head.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •