Baltimore Orioles
Boston Red Sox
New York Yankees
Tampa Bay Rays
Toronto Blue Jays
Chicago White Sox
Cleveland Indians
Detroit Tigers
Kansas City Royals
Minnesota Twins
Houston Astros
LA Angels
Oakland Athleticss
Seattle Mariners
Texas Rangers
Atlanta Braves
Miami Marlins
New York Mets
Philadelphia Phillies
Washington Nationals
Chicago Cubs
Cincinnati Reds
Milwaukee Brewers
Pittsburgh Pirates
St. Louis Cardinals
Arizona Diamondbacks
Colorado Rockies
Los Angeles Dodgers
San Diego Padres
San Francisco GiantsNo on restarting the league. I worked hard just to make this team respectable.
of a rat become Teenage Mutant Ninja Free Agent's
No, that's stupid.
No on restarting the league. I worked hard just to make this team respectable.
2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)
TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)
And no on re-starting the league
http://strike3forums.com/forums/phot...pelbon2006.jpg
Then out of fairness to the others you will be Slagathor.
What is the real problem if someone signs a guy and decides that at the deadline, they want to move that guy if they have the opportunity to do so? It is free agency and not everyone is going to get who they want, why stop them from maybe persuing that guy later in the year if team A has just gone through a terrible season or team A needs a position from team B and it just makes sense trade-wise?
Oh and I'ma vote no on the re-starting. I love how this thing keeps cranking out the seasons like a well-oiled e-machine. We should go till there is absolutely no real MLB people left. Aside from that, we'll always have ample talent if free agency is modified and the ammy drafts have been 3 rounds strong for the last couple of seasons.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
What I'd like to see is in a couple of seasons (2-3), we start importing historical players, so that there are actual MLB players in the league.
"Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic
Sbsl Ii?
<_<
>_>
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
perhaps yay.. but, with the rules and only like 3-4 of the bottom players that become 9-8-8 SP type studs.. nothing extreme though.
I agree with that instead of the editing of players.Originally Posted by General
Please god no.
this league is the more realistic of the 3, because there has been very little editing over the years. i dont feel that that needs to be changed... this league has tons of parity as it is.
and restarting this league or importing historical players into this league would be a MONUMENTAL disaster.
there's more editing going on than people think, from what I know (which may be entirely wrong), but Mission edits the draft class to make it suck less and be more realistic.
Which we're grateful*mckain that he does do that.
I could really live without the editing FAs and what not, I think this is a great league because nothing much really changes over the years and I hate change so I love this league.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
grateful*
and there are obviously more people grateful at the idea of making FA non-stagnant than not, so I would say on a whole, the league seems pretty grateful at it as well.
Eh. It's just not needed. And then there's the rules, more and more rules. I fully understand the notion of limiting teams from dropping 20 million a year on half a dozen of good players, but I don't see the need to restrict trading the guys you signed in free agency. You guys are a mostly stubborn bunch in TC, so there's no reason to worry about some fishy deal passing.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
I just feel the need to point it out - The league made the TC be a stubborn bunch. If we weren't such pricks there would be 10 teams in debt, and they'd have been in debt for at least 8 years because of how bad some GMs were.
I'd say the FA editing is definitely needed, since there is literally two good players in it per year and maybe a max of five young players per year, and that's just ridiculous.
Register To Reply
