Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Marlins want Ponson in Burnett deal

  1. #1
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Kingsport, TN
    Posts
    18,743
    MLB ERA
    3.62

    Marlins want Ponson in Burnett deal

    Ponson emerges as key to deal

    By Juan C. Rodriguez
    Staff Writer
    Posted July 23 2005


    SAN FRANCISCO · Determined to rid themselves of Mike Lowell as part of any A.J. Burnett deal, the Marlins spent Friday working with the Orioles on a scenario that would do just that.

    The teams shifted to finding a landing spot for Orioles right-hander Sidney Ponson. Moving Ponson, who is due about $13.5 million through next season, is paramount to the Orioles absorbing Lowell and the $21 million he's guaranteed through 2007.

    One obstacle to moving Ponson is he has a 10-team, no-trade provision that includes the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. After acquiring him, the Marlins reportedly were ready to send Ponson to Tampa Bay for reliever Trever Miller.

    Barry Praver, Ponson's agent, said: "Neither Sidney nor I have been approached by the Orioles seeking Sidney's consent to accept a trade to Tampa or any other team."

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/b...sports-marlins

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer awefullspellare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,653
    AA ERA
    12.63
    Meh. No Trade Clauses make things suck.

    Wouldn't be a bad trade for the Marlins if they really want to get rid of Lowell, but looks like this is going on the back burner now if Nevin is an O.
    I aim to try
    "Nothing is what rocks dream of."-Aristotle

  3. #3
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Down in Kokomo, where we'll get there fast and then we'll take it slow.
    Posts
    157
    Rookie ERA
    7.14
    One obstacle to moving Ponson is his weight.
    Alright, that zing was not needed and cruel, but I enjoyed it.

    Damn though, the Marlins seem willing to do about anything to dump Lowell. I can't blame them but they're really limiting the AJ Burnett market by playing it this way in my opinion.

  4. #4
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61
    At least Lowell had done something in the past to earn a big contract, Ponson has done crap. The marlins should avoid Ponscum.
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  5. #5
    Team Leader Witlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The Kennel Club
    Posts
    12,642
    MLB ERA
    13.05
    Blog Entries
    2
    Trevor Miller would be all they get for him?

    Remember when the Giants gave 3 pitching spects for the guy? Damn.

  6. #6
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5
    The Giants traded damaged goods to the Orioles for Ponson. Moss faded after compiling a record of 7-1 or something like that, and Ainsworth and Hannaman had injuries.

  7. #7
    Team Leader Witlon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The Kennel Club
    Posts
    12,642
    MLB ERA
    13.05
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by realmofotalk
    The Giants traded damaged goods to the Orioles for Ponson. Moss faded after compiling a record of 7-1 or something like that, and Ainsworth and Hannaman had injuries.
    Doesn't matter. It was still for Sidney Ponson!

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Kingsport, TN
    Posts
    18,743
    MLB ERA
    3.62
    I still don't get why teams even want to mess with Ponson. The Marlins and the Padres must not be thinking correctly. I just don't see Ponson coming back to what he once was. Whatever team wants him, they must have a big plan to get this guy on some kind of a diet.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •