Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
FLAT reporting that Jamie is still a Jew (well, she is one):
Frank McCourt says yes to proposed settlement, but Jamie McCourt says no | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times
"Judge Lichtman has declared the parties to be at impasse. We can only conclude that Jamie rejected Judge Lichtman’s settlement proposal."
Fine by me. Community property, boyyy.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
dylanohernandez
Judge has until Jan. 18 -- not Dec. 28, as originally reported -- to rule in the #McCourt divorce trial: Jamie McCourt rejects divorce settlement proposal - latimes.com
You have got to be shitting me.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
Ruling in Dodgers' divorce case expected Tuesday | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times
But it's looking more and more like the ruling won't mean shit. These two idiots could very well fight until one of them is dead.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
FWIW, my prediction is the MPA will be tossed out, and so I'll never have to use the words inclusive and exclusive in the same breath ever again.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
yup
molly_knight Breaking: Judge in Dodger divorce trial rules for Jamie McCourt, throws out marital property agreement. #dodgers
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
Not sure which side to stand on. On one hand, no LAD fan in his right mind wants Frank to own the team for a long time. On the other hand, it remains to be seen if the Team Jamie zealots will get the forced sale they're hoping for. I don't believe for a second that she isn't in it just for a massive alimony.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
(better late than never)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
redsfan28
Frank and Jamie put the luster in clusterf***
Umm...thanks for this worthless remark.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
'Frank McCourt owns the Dodgers. Jamie McCourt does not,' says attorney for Frank | Dodgers Blog | Los Angeles Times
Quote:
Trope said that in the next trial -- to determine which assets are Frank's, which are Jamie's and which are shared -- Frank would get the Dodgers because they are titled in his name and title trumps community property.
"We are very, very confident that Jamie would be unable to rebut the presumption of title," Trope said.
Title trumps community property? Who is he trying to fool, himself?
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
Quote:
Frank and Jamie McCourt have reached a settlement over the ownership of the Dodgers.
Frank will pay Jamie $130 million to buy out her shares of the team. He could still be forced to sell if Major League Baseball gets its wish, but at least that process will be a bit simpler now that it's not tied to the McCourts' divorce proceedings. Frank is currently trudging the organization through bankruptcy court.
At least one step is over with.
Re: McCourt vs McCourt (Frank fires Jamie)
The idea that this bitch can just walk away with $130 million knowing full well she was every bit as responsible as her ex for the bullshit they put the team through pisses me the fuck off.