Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: Cu-hubs, Soriano, 8 years, $136 mil...wow

  1. #1
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    Cubs Cu-hubs, Soriano, 8 years, $136 mil...wow


  2. #2
    Yuck.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  3. #3
    59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT Dry1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    5,224
    MLB ERA
    2.30
    Dayum.

    17 mil per? Thats a ton of money...

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer CincyRedsFan30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    13,826
    MLB ERA
    3.55
    And the Reds don't go after the real talent.

    How surprising.

    Castellini REALLY wants to win. It doesn't matter we now need offense though.
    The Simpson family gathers around, as Homer places Bart's passed test on the fridge.)

    Homer: We're proud of you, boy.

    Bart: Thanks, Dad. But part of this D-minus belongs to God.

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    One more year than Beltran got, and Soriano is a worse hitter, a worse fielder, and three years older.

    Hopefully they put him at second or center instead of dumping Murton like I know they want to.

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer GiantsFanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sparks, Nevada, United States
    Posts
    2,716
    MLB ERA
    4.81
    Soriano is a career 280 hitter, and Beltran is a career 281 hitter.

    In 06 Beltran hit 275, Soriano hit 277.

    IMO both of these players are overpaid.

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer Halladay_is_God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    5,890
    MLB ERA
    4.54
    wow thats horrible but expected
    S3SL: Toronto Blue Jays' GM - rebuilding to division winner
    http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/7...illsnewbh6.jpg

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    Chicago Tribune reports Soriano will play center and bat leadoff.

    http://chicagosports.chicagotribune....home-headlines

    Good move on the centerfield thing, the leadoff thing should work out pretty well.

  9. #9
    Hero ball. Kingdom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    My office.
    Posts
    56,041
    MLB ERA
    6.85
    Blog Entries
    61
    Hypothetically, he'll be "38" when the deal ends? Or "39" ? ..
    Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
    Ted
    : Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
    Barney: Circle gets the square!

    The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.

  10. #10
    Old Style Drinker
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2,088
    MLB ERA
    3.74
    i think im going to be sick. while the signing shows they are serious about winning "now" this contract is going to be harsh in the somewhat near future.
    The art of being an engineer: packing 10 lbs of crap into a 5 lb box.

    "If Hooter's fell, for all practical purposes the world was lost." Von Neumann's War
    http://www.myspace.com/rockinray1

  11. #11
    AUTOBOTS, ROLL OUT! Molina00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Central Oklahoma
    Posts
    4,594
    MLB ERA
    6.13
    I don't know about Soriano batting leadoff. He had a career high in OBP last year but still, I wouldn't think you would want a guy who strikes out 160 times a year batting leadoff, regardless of his speed.

    I can definately understand $17 mil a year since he had a 40-40 season last year, but 8 years is just horrible for someone his age. Something like a 5 year deal would have made a lot more sense for the Cubs. Great contract for Soriano though. Not many guys who can no longer produce (late 30's) make $17 mil a year.
    Integrity can accommodate the inadvertent error and the honest difference of opinion; it cannot accommodate deceit or subordination of principle.


    LeagueTeamRecordStandingDivision TitlesWild CardLDS WinsLCS WinsWS Wins
    MSLRangers27-111st2731772
    PSLJedi31-448th00000

  12. #12
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    Soriano had such immense success batting leadoff for the Nationals, that I think it makes sense for the Cubs to do it, particularly when they have no one else capable of doing it.

    He showed incredible strides in his eye last year, plus, since he'll likely be batting ahead of a hitter who is much weaker than him in Mark DeRosa (or Royce Clayton or whoever the hell the Nats put behind him), he'll automatically be pitched to a little more carefully.

    Some numbers from 2006:
    Soriano batting leadoff:
    AVG - .294
    OBP - .368
    SLG - .588
    39 HRs, 38 SBs.

    I think those numbers are just too enticing for a manager to go "Well, let's bat him between Lee and Ramirez" when they have no other player who could leadoff.

  13. #13
    Old Style Drinker
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2,088
    MLB ERA
    3.74
    certainly much better numbers than pierre in our leadoff spot, that much is for sure!
    The art of being an engineer: packing 10 lbs of crap into a 5 lb box.

    "If Hooter's fell, for all practical purposes the world was lost." Von Neumann's War
    http://www.myspace.com/rockinray1

  14. #14
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    Yeah, that's true, too. No matter how bad Soriano's eye may be, he'll be better than Pierre and his 30 walks in 700+ PAs.

  15. #15
    Dusty sucks redsfan28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florence, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,351
    MLB ERA
    2.36
    Blog Entries
    1
    This deal is along the lines of the A-Rod deal with Texas in terms of its ridiculousness.
    rf28

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •