Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 95

Thread: New Strike 3 OOTP League

  1. #16
    Hall of Famer MarinersFan87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    3,304
    MLB ERA
    3.24
    I'll definetely be interested.

  2. #17
    Let's Roll CrazyEights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    6,314
    MLB ERA
    3.70
    Quote Originally Posted by Generalissimo
    How about 1990? Makes more sense, as people would be more familiar with the players.
    1990 sounds a little too late, but I do think there would be too many unfamiliar players in starting at 1980. I think 1985 would be a good starting point. A lot of players that have recently retired (some that are still playing) got there start at that time. This way there would be more players that people are familiar with, but it would still be starting 20 years ago.

  3. #18
    To me at all ghettochild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Allen, Texas
    Posts
    2,773
    MLB ERA
    1.49
    i'm in
    i'm scraped and sober but there's no one listening
    [myspace][podcast (10/13)][article]

  4. #19
    Hall of Famer MarinersFan87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    3,304
    MLB ERA
    3.24
    I know we're not calling teams, but I'm fully prepared to beat some ass if someone thinks they are going to be Seattle.

    And 80 or 85 sounds good to me. '85 preferably.

  5. #20
    Let's Roll CrazyEights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    6,314
    MLB ERA
    3.70
    Quote Originally Posted by MarinersFan87
    I know we're not calling teams, but I'm fully prepared to beat some ass if someone thinks they are going to be Seattle.

    And 80 or 85 sounds good to me. '85 preferably.
    i'm always seattle...no reason to change now! lmao

  6. #21
    Indians Mod guybrush77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    311
    Rookie ERA
    7.23
    I think '85 would be good.

  7. #22
    19...19...1985!
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  8. #23
    I'd be up for a 1985 league.

    I'll call Detroit Tigers.

  9. #24
    Hall of Famer MarinersFan87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    3,304
    MLB ERA
    3.24
    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyEights
    i'm always seattle...no reason to change now! lmao
    Bring it.

  10. #25
    Braves, baby.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  11. #26
    Indians Mod guybrush77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    311
    Rookie ERA
    7.23
    Easy guys. We still need to start this thing up. Hold up on calling teams for now.

  12. #27
    So start the damn thing!!!!!!111!!!oneone!!!!11
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  13. #28
    Indians Mod guybrush77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    311
    Rookie ERA
    7.23
    So 1985 sounds good for everyone? If so, we have two ways of going about this.

    1. I can start the league in 1975 or so and sim up to 85 so that the minor leagues have more quality players. or...

    2. I can just start it in 85 and fill the minors with fictional players. (There will be some good prospects, but not as many.)

    I would prefer #2 because Id like us to start fresh and not have all the players have stats from prior to our league. I wouldnt really care either way though.

  14. #29
    Numero Uno.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  15. #30
    #2 sounds good to me.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •