Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

  1. #1
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,337
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Tigers Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    With the season not going as expected and the Tigers not living up to the preseason hype should they start considering packing it in and selling their big names?

    Or should they stick it out this year and continue to build around them next year?

    They can surely stock up on a lot of talent.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  2. #2
    14,558 Unread Posts browntown653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,666
    MLB ERA
    2.44

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    No.
    I did a lot of good things as a sim league GM.

    Ah, give me something clever to say here.

  3. #3
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    I can't imagine that Dombrowski would be restocking the farm with Grade A prospects in the most likely event that he sells their old guys such as Sheffield, Pudge, Kenny Rogers, and Todd Jones.

    Magglio Ordonez is owed $19M for 2009. Piggy Cabrera will be a Tiger for many, many years. And Verlander, Bonderman, and Granderson are all untouchable.

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    I wouldn't give up on them yet. They still have the talent.


    ...Plus, if I tell them they're done, then I have to admit my Mets are done, which just isn't happening yet

  5. #5
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    Its way too soon right now to tell since the Tigers despite all their troubles are only 7.5 games out of first. They can trade certain pieces like Inge for instance to get better pitching.

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer catman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    3,445
    MLB ERA
    3.39

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    Trading Inge would be a bad idea. He is the best 3B on the team. He's also the best backup catcher and a very good outfielder. He can hit, run a bit and throw the ball very well. I would keep him around were I the Tigers.
    "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans...." John Lennon

  7. #7
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    He is the only guy that can bring in any kind of pitching which they desperately need if they are to do anything this season. His talents are being wasted and backup catchers and infielders are a dime a dozen.

  8. #8
    Hall of Famer catman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    3,445
    MLB ERA
    3.39

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    I think they should trade some of their outfielders or backup infielders for pitching. They have a farm system stocked with good talent and should be able to pick up pitchers for a couple of guys.
    I stand behind my statement that trading Inge would be a bad idea. He is, however, willing to go somewhere else to play more regularly. With Vance Wilson on the DL, he's about the only backup catcher the Tigers have right now. You have to have at least 2 guys that can play that position every day.
    "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans...." John Lennon

  9. #9
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Should the Tigers be big sellers at the deadline?

    You think they should trade their backup infielders and that's what Inge is. The Tigers can call up a catcher or get a backup catcher easily. They really aren't hard to find. Michael Barrett for instance is on a last place Padres team. Tigers really don't have much else of value to trade besides Marcus Thames and they need him. If they package something around Inge while eating some of his salary, a team will give them a decent starting pitcher which they need badly. You have to give something to get something in return. Priorities must come first.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •