Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Hatteberg is the answer

  1. #31
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    True.

    Adam dunn's eye is shit.

  2. #32
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    That's why he strikes out so much, moron.

  3. #33
    He doesn't strike out cause his eye sucks. He strikes out because he swings for the fences on every damn swing.

    His eye is actually pretty damn good.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  4. #34
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    Whoooooooooooooosh.

  5. #35
    Teams of Greatness BoSox34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Shelbyville, KY
    Posts
    838
    AA ERA
    3.07
    He doesn't strike out cause his eye sucks. He strikes out because he swings for the fences on every damn swing.
    I said the same thing a while back but Wally disagreed with me lol
    "They asked me if I wanted the ball in Game 6, and I said yes. I'll always say yes. That's what I did with Jack McKeon. I told him, 'Let me see how I feel tomorrow.' I went out, did a long toss, came in and said, 'I'll pitch, I want it, I want to do it.' And it ended up working out." -Josh Beckett

  6. #36
    We can all agree on one thing though: Adam Dunn is a human wind farm.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  7. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Geki Ace
    I think Choi would be good for 30 HRs for us.
    Lets don't get too carried away here.

  8. #38
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    How's that getting carried away? He had 15 homers in Florida in 281 at-bats in 2004, and 15 last year in LA with 320 at-bats. Both of those are extreme pitcher's parks. Giving him 600 ABs for us and putting him in GAB should make that a fairly easy thing to reach.

  9. #39
    YO YO YO griffeyfan3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,693
    AAA ERA
    4.49
    Yea i would have to agree that Choi would definatly give us 30 or maybe even more than 30 hrs. He could definatly hit em out like nothing at GABP.

  10. #40
    Teams of Greatness BoSox34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Shelbyville, KY
    Posts
    838
    AA ERA
    3.07
    30 HR's is possible... but doubtful for Choi, I believe he has the potential to hit 20-25 HR in GABP which would still be a lift for the Reds and a better answer at 1B rather than Hatteberg. Hatteberg only gives the Reds defense, however Choi would give the Reds both defense and offense and while Choi isn't something extremely special with the bat, he is still a better solution offensively than Hatteberg.
    "They asked me if I wanted the ball in Game 6, and I said yes. I'll always say yes. That's what I did with Jack McKeon. I told him, 'Let me see how I feel tomorrow.' I went out, did a long toss, came in and said, 'I'll pitch, I want it, I want to do it.' And it ended up working out." -Josh Beckett

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •