Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 2006 Cincinnati Reds predictions

  1. #1
    Dusty sucks redsfan28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florence, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,351
    MLB ERA
    2.36
    Blog Entries
    1

    2006 Cincinnati Reds predictions

    Predict the number of wins the Reds will have. Also, predict some player stats if you want.

    My prediction: Wins: 80 to 82, good for 4th place in the NL Central behind Houston, St. Louis, and Milwaukee.

    Player stats:

    Griffey - .296 with 38 HR's and 110 RBI's
    Dunn - .256 with 41 HR's and 112 RBI's
    EdE - .266 with 20 HR's and 75 RBI's
    Kearns - .255 with 22 HR's and 60 RBI's
    FeLo - .286 with 15 HR's and 55 RBI's

    Harang - 14-10 with a 4.25 ERA
    Arroyo - 12-15 with a 4.50 ERA
    Milton - 10-17 with a 5.10 ERA
    Williams - 10-15 with a 4.96 ERA
    Claussen - 12-12 with a 4.35 ERA
    rf28

  2. #2
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    Reds will finish in last place. Nl Central will go like this:
    Cards
    Stros (only if Bags is out and Clemens is in)
    Brewers
    Cubs
    Pirates
    Reds

    Now if Bags stays and Clemens is gone
    Cards
    Brewers
    Stros
    Cubs
    Pirates
    Reds

  3. #3
    I agree with you reefer, the Reds will finish in the basement. They will end wih about 70 wins.
    Cards
    Brewers
    Cubs
    Astros
    Pirates
    Reds

  4. #4
    Reds go 78-84.....4th in NL Central

    Stay close until the middle of June..

  5. #5
    i'm frankly shocked. i don't think there's a chance in hell that the cardinals or the astros get the pitching they did last year, and i think the NL central is going to be up in the air until the very end. i think the reds will end up with 88 wins or so.

    cards
    reds
    brewers
    astros
    cubs
    pirates
    Reds MVP Race

    6: Arroyo, Harang
    5: Kearns
    4: Phillips
    3: Dunn, Felo, Freel, Milton
    2: Claussen, EdE, Griffey, Valentin
    1: Aurilia, Hatteberg, Lizard, Larue, Shackelford

  6. #6
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    88 wins?

    Sir, you have roffled my waffle. I'll be pleasantly surprised if they beat last year, but 88 is downright ridiculous.

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer CincyRedsFan30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cincy
    Posts
    13,826
    MLB ERA
    3.55
    I'm going with 81 wins (.500).

    I'll do ERA projections for the starters:

    Harang: 3.95
    Claussen: 4.11
    Arroyo: 4.37
    Milton: 4.84
    Williams: 4.50
    The Simpson family gathers around, as Homer places Bart's passed test on the fridge.)

    Homer: We're proud of you, boy.

    Bart: Thanks, Dad. But part of this D-minus belongs to God.

  8. #8
    as noted in BP today (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=4901), more than 1 in 20 teams improves by more than 20 wins from one year to the next, and more than 1 in 5 teams improves by more than 10. So it's really not that absurd to think the reds could be one of those teams, considering what an abberant year last year was for pitching.

    and what fun would it be to go into the season thinking that your team was going to win 70 games anyway? enjoy your misery.
    Reds MVP Race

    6: Arroyo, Harang
    5: Kearns
    4: Phillips
    3: Dunn, Felo, Freel, Milton
    2: Claussen, EdE, Griffey, Valentin
    1: Aurilia, Hatteberg, Lizard, Larue, Shackelford

  9. #9
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    76-86, two games behind the Brewers and Astros for 5th in the NL Central. Narron replaced midway through the season with someone actually competent.

    Dunn: .271/.404/.598, 50 HR
    Griffey: .286/.358/.547, 32 HR, 131 Games
    Felipe: .301/.362/.481, 26 HR, 21 SB
    Edwin: .278/.353/.463, 21 HR, 9 SB
    Kearns: .274/.371/.511, 30 HR
    Freel: .281/.368/.381, 42 SB/9 CS, 122 Games
    Aurilia: .255/.305/.412, 119 Games
    Womack: .242/.275/.278, 17 SB, 91 Games
    Hatteberg: .262/.346/.373, 8 HR, 104 Games
    LaRue: .267/.353/.444, 16 HR
    Valentin: .281/.359/.451, 11 HR
    Deno: .281/.361/.424, 69 Games

    Harang: 3.52/1.19/7.1, 224 IP
    Claussen: 4.14/1.35/5.8
    Arroyo: 4.56/1.32/5.6
    Milton: 4.94/1.41/6.1, 37 HR Allowed
    Williams: 5.21/1.47/5.5
    Wilson, 4.87/1.35/5.8, 13 GS, 34 Total Appearances

    Weathers: 4.27/1.31/6.5, 19 Saves/7 Blown Saves
    Belisle: 3.93/1.36/7.2, Team lead in Appearances
    Mercker: 3.66/1.37/6.1, Traded at the Deadline
    Hammond: 4.58/1.26/4.8
    White: 5.15/1.58/4.4
    Wags: 3.14/1.25/9.1, 23 Saves/3 Blown Saves
    Coffey: 4.09/1.45/5.5, 18 Holds
    Love Shack: 3.12/1.24/6.3, 36 Appearances

    That's me being incredibly optimistic.

  10. #10
    Dusty sucks redsfan28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florence, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,351
    MLB ERA
    2.36
    Blog Entries
    1
    You can't fire "Baseball Guy" (for those who don't remember, in Narron's introductory press conference, he referred to himself as a "Baseball Guy"). At least, not until after the season where you can have a go at either Joe Torre or Lou Piniella.
    rf28

  11. #11
    Banned Geki Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,861
    MLB ERA
    3.34
    We've got Bucky bleeping Dent to take over in the interim.

  12. #12
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    88 wins? What the hell are you smoking because it ain't pot. The Cards won the Central by 11 games without Rolen. Cubs might win 80 games and they are a far better team than the Reds. Reds simply don't have the pitching that the rest of the Central has.

  13. #13
    Dusty sucks redsfan28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florence, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,351
    MLB ERA
    2.36
    Blog Entries
    1
    Without Prior or Wood, the Cubs won't have 80 wins and the Reds will probably be ahead of them. Wood and Prior are the two biggest question marks in the NL Central.
    rf28

  14. #14
    YO YO YO griffeyfan3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    1,693
    AAA ERA
    4.49
    Well I'm a little sceptical about predicint this year, because last year i predicted a first place finish in the central for the Reds. But I think it's safe to say a nice 80-82 wins this year and a 2nd place finish is very well within the Reds sites for 2006.

  15. #15
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    Quote Originally Posted by redsfan28
    Without Prior or Wood, the Cubs won't have 80 wins and the Reds will probably be ahead of them. Wood and Prior are the two biggest question marks in the NL Central.
    Why would the Reds be ahead of them or even the Pirates for that matter? The Cubs won 79 games last year without Prior and Wood for the most part.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •